Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/bluzername/claude-code-power-stack/planning-with-filesnpx skills add bluzername/claude-code-power-stack --skill planning-with-filesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bluzername/claude-code-power-stackWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/bluzername/claude-code-power-stack/planning-with-files)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bluzername/claude-code-power-stack/planning-with-files"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bluzername/claude-code-power-stack/planning-with-files.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00069 | $0.02042 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00034 | $0.01021 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00408 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00204 |
Grade A, and why
planning-with-files scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
75% identical to planning-with-files — 75 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 242 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Planning with Files
Work like Manus: Use persistent markdown files as your "working memory on disk."
FIRST: Restore Context (v2.2.0)
Before doing anything else, check if planning files exist and read them:
- If
task_plan.mdexists, readtask_plan.md,progress.md, andfindings.mdimmediately. - Then check for unsynced context from a previous session:
# Linux/macOS
$(command -v python3 || command -v python) ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/session-catchup.py "$(pwd)"
# Windows PowerShell
& (Get-Command python -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue).Source "$env:USERPROFILE\.claude\skills\planning-with-files\scripts\session-catchup.py" (Get-Location)
If catchup report shows unsynced context:
- Run
git diff --statto see actual code changes - Read current planning files
- Update planning files based on catchup + git diff
- Then proceed with task
Important: Where Files Go
- Templates are in
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/templates/ - Your planning files go in your project directory
| Location | What Goes There |
|---|---|
Skill directory (${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/) |
Templates, scripts, reference docs |
| Your project directory | task_plan.md, findings.md, progress.md |
Quick Start
Before ANY complex task:
- Create
task_plan.md— Use templates/task_plan.md as reference - Create
findings.md— Use templates/findings.md as reference - Create
progress.md— Use templates/progress.md as reference - Re-read plan before decisions — Refreshes goals in attention window
- Update after each phase — Mark complete, log errors
Note: Planning files go in your project root, not the skill installation folder.
The Core Pattern
Context Window = RAM (volatile, limited)
Filesystem = Disk (persistent, unlimited)
→ Anything important gets written to disk.
File Purposes
| File | Purpose | When to Update |
|---|---|---|
task_plan.md |
Phases, progress, decisions | After each phase |
findings.md |
Research, discoveries | After ANY discovery |
progress.md |
Session log, test results | Throughout session |
What ships with it
10 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- examples.md 4.4 KB
- reference.md 7.9 KB
- scripts/check-complete.ps1 1.8 KB runs code
- scripts/check-complete.sh 1.7 KB runs code
- scripts/init-session.ps1 2.4 KB runs code
- scripts/init-session.sh 2.2 KB runs code
- scripts/session-catchup.py 7.3 KB runs code
- templates/findings.md 3.5 KB
- templates/progress.md 3.9 KB
- templates/task_plan.md 4.5 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 242 lines · 69 tokens per session scan A 5642bb976e17
planning-with-files is a skill published in the GitHub repository bluzername/claude-code-power-stack (2 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 69 tokens to every session and 2,042 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 75% identical to planning-with-files, differing in 75 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
kayba-stage-3-metrics
Define metrics from Kayba insights, implement them as Python measurement code, run against traces, and iterate until the metrics are clean and meaningful. Trigger when the user says "run stage 3", "define metrics", "build metrics", "compute baselines", or when invoked by the kayba-pipeline orchestrator. Requires…
kayba-stage-5-action-plan
Triage each insight into discard/code-fix/prompt-fix and produce a prioritized action plan with specific recommendations. Trigger when the user says "run stage 5", "make action plan", "triage skills", or when invoked by the kayba-pipeline orchestrator. Requires eval outputs from stages 1-4.
kayba-stage-6-hitl
Human-In-The-Loop gate that presents the action plan with full context, collects an informed approval/modification/rejection decision, and records the outcome. Trigger when the user says "run stage 6", "HITL review", "approve action plan", or when invoked by the kayba-pipeline orchestrator. Requires eval/actionplan.md…
kayba-pipeline
End-to-end agent evaluation and improvement pipeline. Takes a traces folder and optional HITL flag, then orchestrates sub-agents through 7 stages — each stage is its own skill invoked by a dedicated sub-agent. Trigger when the user says "run the pipeline", "kayba pipeline", "evaluate and fix", "full eval", "analyze…
kayba-stage-2-domain-context
Gather domain context about the repository and agent — system prompt, tool definitions, domain docs, and behavior patterns from traces. Trigger when the user says "run stage 2", "gather context", "domain context", or when invoked by the kayba-pipeline orchestrator.
kayba-stage-7-fixer
Implement the approved fixes from the action plan and log all changes. Trigger when the user says "run stage 7", "implement fixes", "apply action plan", or when invoked by the kayba-pipeline orchestrator. Requires eval/actionplan.md to exist.