publisher-performance-review

publisher-performance-review is a skill for Claude Code from bobberrisford/affiliatemcp. It costs 103 tokens per session (1,316 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A focused performance review of one affiliate publisher for a brand. An affiliate publisher is a partner that sends customers to a retailer and may earn commission when they buy.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review clicks, conversions, earnings per click, average order value, commission, statuses, trends, and discussion points for one publisher.
Why use it?
It gathers the figures and context needed for a partner call instead of making the account manager search across reports. It also accounts for metrics that a network cannot actually measure.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the affiliate-networks-mcp plugin — 37 skills, 1 MCP server shipped together

Good fit Use it to review clicks, conversions, earnings per click, average order value, commission, statuses, trends, and discussion points for one publisher.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/bobberrisford/affiliatemcp/publisher-performance-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add bobberrisford/affiliatemcp --skill publisher-performance-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bobberrisford/affiliatemcp

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install affiliate-networks-mcp, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 37 skills, 1 MCP server.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for publisher-performance-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bobberrisford/affiliatemcp/publisher-performance-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/bobberrisford/affiliatemcp/publisher-performance-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bobberrisford/affiliatemcp/publisher-performance-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bobberrisford/affiliatemcp/publisher-performance-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for publisher-performance-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bobberrisford/affiliatemcp/publisher-performance-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bobberrisford/affiliatemcp/publisher-performance-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 103 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,316 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00103 $0.01316
Opus 5 $0.00051 $0.00658
Sonnet 5 $0.00021 $0.00263
Haiku 4.5 $0.00010 $0.00132

Measured 12d ago against content hash 42820c486512, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

publisher-performance-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/publisher-performance-review/SKILL.md · 87 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 87 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Operating instructions

You are producing a single-publisher performance review for one brand: a focused profile of how one partner is performing, built so the account manager can walk into a call knowing the numbers and the story behind them. Unlike programme-performance-report (every publisher), this skill is about one partner across the period.

Step 1 — resolve the brand

If the user did not name a brand, ask which one. Do not guess.

Call affiliate_resolve_brand. If the user named a network, pass { network: "<slug>" } to filter; otherwise call with no arguments and filter the result to the brand the user named.

The response is an array of { brand, network, networkBrandId }. Reduce it to the bindings whose brand matches the user's brand. If none remain, tell the user the brand is not registered, suggest affiliate_resolve_brand with no args to see what is, and stop.

Call affiliate_list_networks once and retain the metadata for those bindings. Use each network's knownLimitations when deciding whether clicks or another field are genuinely observed. Do not interpret a normalised zero as observed zero when the network says that metric is unavailable.

Step 2 — identify the publisher

Publisher ids are network-specific. Call affiliate_<network>_list_media_partners for each binding and match the user's named partner against name separately on each network:

  • Awin advertiser: affiliate_awin-advertiser_list_media_partners({ brand })

This returns MediaPartner[] with id, name, status. Record a separate publisherId and relationship status for every matching network binding. If a name matches more than one partner on a network, list the candidates and ask which. If it matches none on one network, report that gap and continue with the remaining bindings. Stop only when no binding has a match.

Step 3 — pick the windows

Default period: the last 90 days, ending today, so the trend is visible. Honour explicit windows. Compute a comparison window of the same length immediately prior for the period-over-period view. Express all dates as ISO YYYY-MM-DD. State both windows at the top.

Read the full file on GitHub · 87 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 87 lines · 103 tokens per session scan A 42820c486512

Subscribe to this mod's changes

publisher-performance-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository bobberrisford/affiliatemcp (6 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 103 tokens to every session and 1,316 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

local-ai-agents

Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…

microsoft/ai-agents-for-beginners · 200 tokens

next-cache-components-adoption

Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…

vercel/next.js · 95 tokens

chat-pet-sprite-creation

Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.

microsoft/vscode · 53 tokens

cpu-profile-analysis

Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…

microsoft/vscode · 71 tokens

insight-error-page

Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…

vercel/next.js · 83 tokens