Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add bobmatnyc/claude-mpm-skills --skill dspygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bobmatnyc/claude-mpm-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/bobmatnyc/claude-mpm-skills/dspy)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bobmatnyc/claude-mpm-skills/dspy"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bobmatnyc/claude-mpm-skills/dspy/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bobmatnyc/claude-mpm-skills/dspy"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bobmatnyc/claude-mpm-skills/dspy.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00022 | $0.10353 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00011 | $0.05176 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.02071 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.01035 |
Grade A, and why
dspy scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 1,562 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
DSPy Framework
progressive_disclosure: entry_point: summary: "Declarative framework for automatic prompt optimization treating prompts as code" when_to_use: - "When optimizing prompts systematically with evaluation data" - "When building production LLM systems requiring accuracy improvements" - "When implementing RAG, classification, or structured extraction tasks" - "When version-controlled, reproducible prompts are needed" quick_start: - "pip install dspy-ai" - "Define signature: class QA(dspy.Signature): question = dspy.InputField(); answer = dspy.OutputField()" - "Create module: qa = dspy.ChainOfThought(QA)" - "Optimize: optimizer.compile(qa, trainset=examples)" token_estimate: entry: 75 full: 5500
Core Philosophy
DSPy (Declarative Self-improving Python) shifts focus from manual prompt engineering to programming language models. Treat prompts as code with:
- Declarative signatures defining inputs/outputs
- Automatic optimization via compilers
- Version control and systematic testing
- Reproducible results across model changes
Key Principle: Don't write prompts manually—define task specifications and let DSPy optimize them.
Core Concepts
Signatures: Defining Task Interfaces
Signatures specify what your LM module should do (inputs → outputs) without saying how.
Basic Signature:
import dspy
# Inline signature (quick)
qa_module = dspy.ChainOfThought("question -> answer")
# Class-based signature (recommended for production)
class QuestionAnswer(dspy.Signature):
"""Answer questions with short factual answers."""
question = dspy.InputField()
answer = dspy.OutputField(desc="often between 1 and 5 words")
# Use signature
qa = dspy.ChainOfThought(QuestionAnswer)
response = qa(question="What is the capital of France?")
print(response.answer) # "Paris"
Advanced Signatures with Type Hints:
from typing import List
class DocumentSummary(dspy.Signature):
"""Generate concise document summaries."""
document: str = dspy.InputField(desc="Full text to summarize")
key_points: List[str] = dspy.OutputField(desc="3-5 bullet points")
summary: str = dspy.OutputField(desc="2-3 sentence summary")
sentiment: str = dspy.OutputField(desc="positive, negative, or neutral")
# Type hints provide strong typing and validation
summarizer = dspy.ChainOfThought(DocumentSummary)
result = summarizer(document="Long document text...")
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 1,562 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A 13d6dfcb3b7d
dspy is a skill published in the GitHub repository bobmatnyc/claude-mpm-skills (75 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 10,353 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
llm-app-patterns
Production-ready patterns for building LLM applications. Covers RAG pipelines, agent architectures, prompt IDEs, and LLMOps monitoring. Use when designing AI applications, implementing RAG, building agents, or setting up LLM observability.
prompt-optimization
Improve a prompt on the evaluations workbench through a measured loop. Score the baseline first, then duplicate the target column, form a hypothesis from failing rows, edit the copy's prompt draft, run, compare pass rate and cost, and repeat until the numbers hold. Use when the user asks to optimize or improve a…
enhance-prompt
Transforms vague UI ideas into polished, Stitch-optimized prompts. Enhances specificity, adds UI/UX keywords, injects design system context, and structures output for better generation results.
prompt-engineer
Writes, refactors, and evaluates prompts for LLMs — generating optimized prompt templates, structured output schemas, evaluation rubrics, and test suites. Use when designing prompts for new LLM applications, refactoring existing prompts for better accuracy or token efficiency, implementing chain-of-thought or few-shot…
seedance-vocab-en
This skill should be used when an English Seedance 2.0 prompt needs clearer production wording, less generic prose, or precise vocabulary for camera, lighting, motion, VFX, audio, and constraints. Route blocked prompts through seedance-filter for context and boundary review.
ideogram4
Prompting patterns for Ideogram 4 text-to-image — best-in-class in-image text rendering and exact color/layout control via structured JSON captions. Use when generating images that need legible on-image text (title cards, thumbnails, logos, signage, CTAs), precise brand colors, or controlled spatial layout. Triggers…