test-quality-inspector

test-quality-inspector is a skill for Claude Code from bobmatnyc/claude-mpm-skills. It costs 21 tokens per session (2,997 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A framework for inspecting whether a test suite checks the behavior that matters and covers important cases.

In plain words
What is it for?
It helps review test coverage, identify gaps, and check whether tests would catch invalid or incomplete behavior.
Why use it?
It exposes weak assertions and missing scenarios that can let broken code pass the tests.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: disable-model-invocation in frontmatter.

Good fit It helps review test coverage, identify gaps, and check whether tests would catch invalid or incomplete behavior.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/bobmatnyc/claude-mpm-skills/test-quality-inspector
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add bobmatnyc/claude-mpm-skills --skill test-quality-inspector
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bobmatnyc/claude-mpm-skills

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for test-quality-inspector

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bobmatnyc/claude-mpm-skills/test-quality-inspector/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/bobmatnyc/claude-mpm-skills/test-quality-inspector)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bobmatnyc/claude-mpm-skills/test-quality-inspector"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bobmatnyc/claude-mpm-skills/test-quality-inspector/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for test-quality-inspector

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bobmatnyc/claude-mpm-skills/test-quality-inspector"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bobmatnyc/claude-mpm-skills/test-quality-inspector.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 21 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,997 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00021 $0.02997
Opus 5 $0.00010 $0.01499
Sonnet 5 $0.00004 $0.00599
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00300

Measured 9d ago against content hash 0057eeef0b2d, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

test-quality-inspector scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

universal/testing/test-quality-inspector/SKILL.md · 427 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 427 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Example Test Inspection Report

Scenario: User Registration Feature

Engineer's Test Suite

# test_user_registration.py

def test_user_creation():
    """Test user creation"""
    user = create_user("[email protected]", "password123")
    assert user

def test_login():
    """Test login"""
    user = create_user("[email protected]", "password123")
    result = login("[email protected]", "password123")
    assert result

def test_duplicate_email():
    """Test duplicate email"""
    create_user("[email protected]", "password123")
    user2 = create_user("[email protected]", "password456")
    assert user2

QA Inspection Report

Test 1: test_user_creation()

Claimed Intent: Test user creation Actually Tests: Object instantiation only

Issues Found

🔴 CRITICAL: Worthless Assertion

assert user  # Line 5
  • Would pass with corrupt data
  • Would pass with wrong email
  • Would pass with invalid password hash
  • Would pass if database save failed

Mental Debug: User object with garbage data would pass this test.

🟠 HIGH: Missing Validation Tests

  • No test for invalid email format
  • No test for weak password
  • No test for duplicate email (separate test exists but broken)
  • No test for SQL injection in email

🟠 HIGH: No Persistence Verification

  • Test doesn't verify user is saved to database
  • Test doesn't verify user can be retrieved
  • Transaction might be rolled back

🟡 MEDIUM: Vague Test Name

  • "test_user_creation" doesn't describe what should happen
  • Better: "test_user_creation_with_valid_data_persists_to_database"
Suggested Improvements
def test_user_creation_with_valid_data_persists_to_database():
    """Creating a user with valid email and password should:
    1. Create user object with correct attributes
    2. Save to database
    3. Hash password (not store plaintext)
    4. Set default role and active status
    """
    email = "[email protected]"
    password = "SecurePass123!"

    user = create_user(email, password)

    # Verify user object
    assert user.id is not None, "User should have an ID after creation"
    assert user.email == email, "Email should match input"
    assert user.is_active is True, "New users should be active by default"
    assert user.role == "user", "New users should have 'user' role"
    assert user.created_at is not None, "Created timestamp should be set"

    # Verify password is hashed, not plaintext
    assert user.password_hash != password, "Password should be hashed"
    assert len(user.password_hash) > 50, "Password hash should be substantial"

    # Verify persistence
    retrieved_user = User.get_by_email(email)
    assert retrieved_user is not None, "User should be retrievable from database"
    assert retrieved_user.id == user.id, "Retrieved user should match created user"

def test_user_creation_with_invalid_email_format_raises_validation_error():
    """Creating a user with malformed email should raise ValidationError"""
    invalid_emails = [
        "not-an-email",
        "@example.com",
        "test@",
        "test [email protected]",
        "",
    ]

    for invalid_email in invalid_emails:
        with pytest.raises(ValidationError) as exc:
            create_user(invalid_email, "password123")

        assert "email" in str(exc.value).lower()
        assert "invalid" in str(exc.value).lower()

def test_user_creation_with_weak_password_raises_validation_error():
    """Creating a user with weak password should raise ValidationError"""
    weak_passwords = [
        "123",          # Too short
        "password",     # No numbers
        "12345678",     # No letters
        "",             # Empty
    ]

    for weak_password in weak_passwords:
        with pytest.raises(ValidationError) as exc:
            create_user("[email protected]", weak_password)

        assert "password" in str(exc.value).lower()

Read the full file on GitHub · 427 lines

Files

What ships with it

4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 427 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A 0057eeef0b2d

Subscribe to this mod's changes

test-quality-inspector is a skill published in the GitHub repository bobmatnyc/claude-mpm-skills (75 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 2,997 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

research-engineer

An uncompromising Academic Research Engineer. Operates with absolute scientific rigor, objective criticism, and zero flair. Focuses on theoretical correctness, formal verification, and optimal implementation across any required technology.

davila7/claude-code-templates · 43 tokens

tika-eval-compare

Compare extracts from two Tika builds over a corpus to detect regressions in content, encoding, exceptions, and embedded-document handling. Use for "compare before/after extracts", "eval this change against the corpus".

apache/tika · 50 tokens

neuron-evaluation-engineer

Create and run AI evaluations with datasets, assertions, and output drivers in Neuron AI. Use this skill whenever the user mentions evaluation, testing AI systems, creating evaluators, dataset-driven testing, assertion-based validation, or wants to measure AI system performance. Also trigger for tasks involving…

neuron-core/neuron-ai · 77 tokens

jetson-validate-image

Use after jetson-flash-image to run static BSP checks, on-target smoke/regression tests on a flashed DUT, or both. Not for build or flash steps. Triggers: validate bsp, on-target validation.

NVIDIA/skills · 50 tokens

atmos-validation

Validate Atmos projects, components, arbitrary JSON Schema inputs, EditorConfig, and GitHub Actions; use affected-file selection and native CI annotations.

cloudposse/atmos · 31 tokens

skill-benchmark

Benchmark AI skill effectiveness by measuring implementation quality against legacy constraints.

HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard · 16 tokens