Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to bonnguyenitc/antigravity-superpowers. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/bonnguyenitc/antigravity-superpowers/main/.agent/skills/finishing-a-development-branch/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bonnguyenitc/antigravity-superpowersWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/bonnguyenitc/antigravity-superpowers/finishing-a-development-branch)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bonnguyenitc/antigravity-superpowers/finishing-a-development-branch"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bonnguyenitc/antigravity-superpowers/finishing-a-development-branch/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bonnguyenitc/antigravity-superpowers/finishing-a-development-branch"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bonnguyenitc/antigravity-superpowers/finishing-a-development-branch.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00044 | $0.01239 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00620 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00248 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00124 |
Grade A, and why
finishing-a-development-branch scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 208 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Finishing a Development Branch
Overview
Guide completion of development work by presenting clear options and handling chosen workflow.
Core principle: Verify tests → Present options → Execute choice → Clean up.
Announce at start: "I'm using the finishing-a-development-branch skill to complete this work."
The Process
Step 1: Verify Tests
Before presenting options, verify tests pass:
# Run project's test suite
npm test / cargo test / pytest / go test ./...
If tests fail:
Tests failing (<N> failures). Must fix before completing:
[Show failures]
Cannot proceed with merge/PR until tests pass.
Stop. Don't proceed to Step 2.
If tests pass: Continue to Step 2.
Step 2: Determine Base Branch
# Try common base branches
git merge-base HEAD main 2>/dev/null || git merge-base HEAD master 2>/dev/null
Or ask: "This branch split from main - is that correct?"
Step 3: Present Options
Present exactly these 4 options:
Implementation complete. What would you like to do?
1. Merge back to <base-branch> locally
2. Push and create a Pull Request
3. Keep the branch as-is (I'll handle it later)
4. Discard this work
Which option?
Don't add explanation - keep options concise.
Step 4: Execute Choice
Option 1: Merge Locally
Read .agent/config.yml — check auto_commit setting. If auto_commit: false: skip the merge, print "Skipping git operation (auto_commit: false)." and go to Step 5. If auto_commit: true (or absent): proceed.
# Switch to base branch
git checkout <base-branch>
# Pull latest
git pull
# Merge feature branch
git merge <feature-branch>
# Verify tests on merged result
<test command>
# If tests pass
git branch -d <feature-branch>
Then: Cleanup worktree (Step 5)
Option 2: Push and Create PR
Read .agent/config.yml — check auto_commit setting. If auto_commit: false: skip the push, print "Skipping git operation (auto_commit: false)." If auto_commit: true (or absent): proceed.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 208 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A abd9dc1c38ed
finishing-a-development-branch is a skill published in the GitHub repository bonnguyenitc/antigravity-superpowers (19 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 1,239 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
release-verification
A release-verification checklist for software versions and packages. It covers changelogs, tests, packaging, installation smoke checks, version-control actions, publishing, and checks after release.
audit-release
A pre-release review assistant that checks whether a software package or plugin is ready to publish.
memstack-development-changelog-generator
Use when the user says 'generate changelog', 'update changelog', 'what changed', 'release notes', 'write changelog', or needs a formatted CHANGELOG.md from git commit history. Do NOT use for diary entries, git log viewing, or commit message writing.
ship
Use when code is ready to ship — creates PRs, merges, deploys, and verifies. Handles the full PR-to-production pipeline. Triggers on /ship.
release-readiness
Use after review/qa/security/license-audit/privacy-check to compose a release decision before /ship. Returns OK only when all required upstream evidence is present and clean. Triggers on /release-readiness.
ijfw-ship
Use when the user says 'ship it', 'ship this', 'release', 'publish', 'launch', 'deploy', 'go live', 'wrap this up', 'time to ship', or invokes '/ijfw-ship'. Domain-aware release — software (test → tag → push → publish), book (final edit → format → KDP / agent / Substack), campaign (review → schedule → launch →…