Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add bookforge-ai/bookforge-skills --skill modularity-health-evaluatorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bookforge-ai/bookforge-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/bookforge-ai/bookforge-skills/modularity-health-evaluator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bookforge-ai/bookforge-skills/modularity-health-evaluator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bookforge-ai/bookforge-skills/modularity-health-evaluator/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bookforge-ai/bookforge-skills/modularity-health-evaluator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bookforge-ai/bookforge-skills/modularity-health-evaluator.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00134 | $0.05130 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00067 | $0.02565 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00027 | $0.01026 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00513 |
Grade A, and why
modularity-health-evaluator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed CC-BY-SA-4.0
The repository is licensed CC-BY-SA-4.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 349 lines · 134 tokens per session scan A 6b8e1a5ddfaf
modularity-health-evaluator is a skill published in the GitHub repository bookforge-ai/bookforge-skills (35 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed CC-BY-SA-4.0. It adds 134 tokens to every session and 5,130 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
refactoring-workflow
Improve the structure of existing code without changing its behaviour, in small verified steps under a green test suite. Use when the user asks to refactor, clean up, restructure or simplify code, wants to reduce duplication or coupling, is preparing a codebase for a feature it cannot currently accommodate, or when…
balanced-coupling
The Balanced Coupling model for software design. Use when: designing modular architectures, evaluating coupling between components, reviewing code modularity, deciding whether to split or merge modules/services, assessing integration patterns, classifying coupling as balanced or unbalanced, applying DDD strategic and…
review
Analyzes a codebase's modularity imbalances using the Balanced Coupling model and produces a review of design issues. Use when reviewing existing code for coupling problems, assessing architecture quality, identifying distributed monolith risks, or finding areas where changes are unexpectedly expensive.
refactoring-expert
Expert skill for Clean Code, Refactoring, and Design Patterns. Combines Refactoring Guru's deep patterns with Supercent's rigorous operational metrics and validation workflows.
code-quality
Clean code principles, SOLID, and code review practices.
nw-sc-review-dimensions
Reviewer critique dimensions for peer review - implementation bias detection, test quality validation, completeness checks, and priority validation.