Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/bookforge-ai/bookforge-skills/secure-code-reviewnpx skills add bookforge-ai/bookforge-skills --skill secure-code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bookforge-ai/bookforge-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/bookforge-ai/bookforge-skills/secure-code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bookforge-ai/bookforge-skills/secure-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bookforge-ai/bookforge-skills/secure-code-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00162 | $0.06488 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00081 | $0.03244 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00032 | $0.01298 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00649 |
Grade A, and why
secure-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed CC-BY-SA-4.0
The repository is licensed CC-BY-SA-4.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 495 lines · 162 tokens per session scan A 65a7f9f7296c
secure-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository bookforge-ai/bookforge-skills (35 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed CC-BY-SA-4.0. It adds 162 tokens to every session and 6,488 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
testing-anti-patterns
Reviews test code to identify and fix common testing anti-patterns including flaky tests, over-mocking, brittle assertions, test interdependency, and hidden test logic. Flags bad patterns, explains the specific defect, and provides corrected implementations. Use when reviewing test code, debugging intermittent or…
code-quality-analysis
Analyze Angular / Cumulocity Web SDK code for anti-patterns, bugs, and quality issues. Use when reviewing components, services, or modules for code quality, maintainability, performance, and correctness. Covers TypeScript best practices, Angular idioms, C8Y SDK usage patterns, and project-specific conventions.…
code-quality
Python code-quality anti-patterns and review checks: exception-hierarchy correctness, singleton identity comparison, narrow exception handling, wildcard-import avoidance, magic-number naming, and dead-local removal. Use when reviewing or self-reviewing Python code for correctness and readability defects that linters…
Nullability Contract Review
Detect null/undefined/empty handling gaps where callers or consumers may receive unexpected nullish values.
Coverage and Failure Path Gaps
Find missing tests for critical paths, edge cases, and failure handling in changed code.
Firebase Security Rules Review
Detects over-permissive Firestore/Storage rules (allow read, write: if true / auth-only without ownership), missing auth checks on writes, and admin SDK private key exposure to client bundles.