brutal-exhaustive-audit

brutal-exhaustive-audit is a skill for Claude Code from boparaiamrit/skills-by-amrit. It costs 68 tokens per session (2,746 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A multi-pass process for checking an entire product file by file, route by route, and user flow by user flow, including edge cases.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it for exhaustive audits after major refactors, migrations, integrations, or before a release or demo.
Why use it?
It reduces the chance that hidden defects or untested paths are missed during a large review or before release.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the skills-by-amrit plugin — 33 skills, 34 commands, 9 agents shipped together

Good fit Use it for exhaustive audits after major refactors, migrations, integrations, or before a release or demo.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/boparaiamrit/skills-by-amrit/brutal-exhaustive-audit
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add boparaiamrit/skills-by-amrit --skill brutal-exhaustive-audit
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/boparaiamrit/skills-by-amrit

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install skills-by-amrit, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 33 skills, 34 commands, 9 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for brutal-exhaustive-audit

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/boparaiamrit/skills-by-amrit/brutal-exhaustive-audit/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/boparaiamrit/skills-by-amrit/brutal-exhaustive-audit)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/boparaiamrit/skills-by-amrit/brutal-exhaustive-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/boparaiamrit/skills-by-amrit/brutal-exhaustive-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for brutal-exhaustive-audit

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/boparaiamrit/skills-by-amrit/brutal-exhaustive-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/boparaiamrit/skills-by-amrit/brutal-exhaustive-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 68 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,746 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00068 $0.02746
Opus 5 $0.00034 $0.01373
Sonnet 5 $0.00014 $0.00549
Haiku 4.5 $0.00007 $0.00275

Measured 9d ago against content hash 5658e07ac890, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

brutal-exhaustive-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/brutal-exhaustive-audit/SKILL.md · 333 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 333 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Brutal Exhaustive Audit

Overview

This is the "be exhaustive, be brutal, check everything" skill codified into an enforceable process. AI's context window makes it forget things, skip files, and declare victory early. This skill prevents all of that through mandatory multi-pass verification with explicit checklists.

Core principle: Every file checked. Every route visited. Every flow walked. No exceptions, no shortcuts, no "it's probably fine."

The Iron Law

NO FILE UNCHECKED. NO ROUTE UNVISITED. NO FLOW UNTESTED. NO CLAIM WITHOUT EVIDENCE.
IF YOU HAVEN'T EXPLICITLY VERIFIED IT, IT IS BROKEN UNTIL PROVEN OTHERWISE.

When to Use

  • When you say "be exhaustive" or "be brutal" or "check everything"
  • When you don't trust the AI did a complete job
  • When previous fixes introduced new problems
  • After a large-scale refactoring or migration
  • After API integration to verify nothing was missed
  • Before a release or demo
  • When the product "should work" but something feels wrong

When NOT to Use

  • For a quick single-file fix (use fix-issue)
  • For understanding a new codebase (use codebase-mapping)

The Five Passes

THIS AUDIT HAS FIVE MANDATORY PASSES.
EACH PASS PRODUCES A CHECKLIST.
EVERY ITEM ON EVERY CHECKLIST MUST BE EXPLICITLY VERIFIED.
SKIPPING A PASS IS NOT AN OPTION.

Pass 1: Build & Static Analysis (THE FOUNDATION)

IF IT DOESN'T BUILD, NOTHING ELSE MATTERS.

1. CLEAN BUILD:
   □ Delete all build artifacts (dist, .next, build, __pycache__)
   □ Delete node_modules and reinstall (npm ci or pip install -r requirements.txt)
   □ Run the build from scratch
   □ Record: Exit code, warnings, errors
   □ EVERY warning matters — list them all

2. TYPE CHECK (if applicable):
   □ Run TypeScript compiler with --noEmit (or mypy/pyright)
   □ Record: EVERY type error, not just the count
   □ Categorize: Critical (broken logic) vs Minor (missing annotation)

3. LINT CHECK:
   □ Run the full linter
   □ Record: EVERY lint error
   □ Flag: Any rules that are disabled or overridden (eslint-disable, noqa, etc.)

4. DEPENDENCY CHECK:
   □ Are there unused dependencies?
   □ Are there missing dependencies?
   □ Are there security vulnerabilities? (npm audit, pip-audit)
   □ Are there peer dependency conflicts?

5. ENVIRONMENT CHECK:
   □ Are all required environment variables documented?
   □ Are all required environment variables set (or have defaults)?
   □ Are there environment-specific configurations that could break?

PASS 1 RESULT:
| Check | Status | Issues |
|-------|--------|--------|
| Clean Build | ✅/❌ | [details] |
| Type Check | ✅/❌ | [N errors listed] |
| Lint | ✅/❌ | [N errors listed] |
| Dependencies | ✅/❌ | [details] |
| Environment | ✅/❌ | [details] |

Read the full file on GitHub · 333 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 333 lines · 68 tokens per session scan A 5658e07ac890

Subscribe to this mod's changes

brutal-exhaustive-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository boparaiamrit/skills-by-amrit (5 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 68 tokens to every session and 2,746 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

4-phase root cause debugging: understand bugs before fixing.

NousResearch/hermes-agent · 16 tokens

langsmith-observability

LLM observability platform for tracing, evaluation, and monitoring. Use when debugging LLM applications, evaluating model outputs against datasets, monitoring production systems, or building systematic testing pipelines for AI applications.

davila7/claude-code-templates · 45 tokens

experimental-code-coverage-local-debugger

Runs code coverage locally via Universal Test Runner (UTR) or helper scripts, mimicking LUCI trybots. Activate when CQ tryjobs fail or underreport coverage, to test local GN/recipe repairs before uploading, or to debug hermetic crashes.

chromium/chromium · 59 tokens

adversarial-reviewer

Adversarial code review that assumes bugs exist and hunts for them. Use when asked to review code, find bugs, audit for correctness, stress-test a PR, or when someone says "tear this apart" or "what's wrong with this". Give no benefit of the doubt — every line is guilty until proven innocent.

emdash-cms/emdash · 71 tokens

cli-e2e

Write, modify, or debug Docker-based Composio CLI end-to-end tests under ts/e2e-tests/cli, including binary invocation, fixture isolation, output assertions, and package manifests. Use for CLI E2E test suites only; use cli-command for CLI source implementation.

ComposioHQ/composio · 62 tokens

work

Deliver one maintainer-approved EmDash issue, choosing the bug-fix path for a defect and the direct implementation path for an enhancement or task.

emdash-cms/emdash · 31 tokens