Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add boparaiamrit/skills-by-amrit --skill brutal-exhaustive-auditgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/boparaiamrit/skills-by-amritWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/boparaiamrit/skills-by-amrit/brutal-exhaustive-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/boparaiamrit/skills-by-amrit/brutal-exhaustive-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/boparaiamrit/skills-by-amrit/brutal-exhaustive-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/boparaiamrit/skills-by-amrit/brutal-exhaustive-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/boparaiamrit/skills-by-amrit/brutal-exhaustive-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00068 | $0.02746 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00034 | $0.01373 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00549 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00275 |
Grade A, and why
brutal-exhaustive-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 333 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Brutal Exhaustive Audit
Overview
This is the "be exhaustive, be brutal, check everything" skill codified into an enforceable process. AI's context window makes it forget things, skip files, and declare victory early. This skill prevents all of that through mandatory multi-pass verification with explicit checklists.
Core principle: Every file checked. Every route visited. Every flow walked. No exceptions, no shortcuts, no "it's probably fine."
The Iron Law
NO FILE UNCHECKED. NO ROUTE UNVISITED. NO FLOW UNTESTED. NO CLAIM WITHOUT EVIDENCE.
IF YOU HAVEN'T EXPLICITLY VERIFIED IT, IT IS BROKEN UNTIL PROVEN OTHERWISE.
When to Use
- When you say "be exhaustive" or "be brutal" or "check everything"
- When you don't trust the AI did a complete job
- When previous fixes introduced new problems
- After a large-scale refactoring or migration
- After API integration to verify nothing was missed
- Before a release or demo
- When the product "should work" but something feels wrong
When NOT to Use
- For a quick single-file fix (use
fix-issue) - For understanding a new codebase (use
codebase-mapping)
The Five Passes
THIS AUDIT HAS FIVE MANDATORY PASSES.
EACH PASS PRODUCES A CHECKLIST.
EVERY ITEM ON EVERY CHECKLIST MUST BE EXPLICITLY VERIFIED.
SKIPPING A PASS IS NOT AN OPTION.
Pass 1: Build & Static Analysis (THE FOUNDATION)
IF IT DOESN'T BUILD, NOTHING ELSE MATTERS.
1. CLEAN BUILD:
□ Delete all build artifacts (dist, .next, build, __pycache__)
□ Delete node_modules and reinstall (npm ci or pip install -r requirements.txt)
□ Run the build from scratch
□ Record: Exit code, warnings, errors
□ EVERY warning matters — list them all
2. TYPE CHECK (if applicable):
□ Run TypeScript compiler with --noEmit (or mypy/pyright)
□ Record: EVERY type error, not just the count
□ Categorize: Critical (broken logic) vs Minor (missing annotation)
3. LINT CHECK:
□ Run the full linter
□ Record: EVERY lint error
□ Flag: Any rules that are disabled or overridden (eslint-disable, noqa, etc.)
4. DEPENDENCY CHECK:
□ Are there unused dependencies?
□ Are there missing dependencies?
□ Are there security vulnerabilities? (npm audit, pip-audit)
□ Are there peer dependency conflicts?
5. ENVIRONMENT CHECK:
□ Are all required environment variables documented?
□ Are all required environment variables set (or have defaults)?
□ Are there environment-specific configurations that could break?
PASS 1 RESULT:
| Check | Status | Issues |
|-------|--------|--------|
| Clean Build | ✅/❌ | [details] |
| Type Check | ✅/❌ | [N errors listed] |
| Lint | ✅/❌ | [N errors listed] |
| Dependencies | ✅/❌ | [details] |
| Environment | ✅/❌ | [details] |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 333 lines · 68 tokens per session scan A 5658e07ac890
brutal-exhaustive-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository boparaiamrit/skills-by-amrit (5 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 68 tokens to every session and 2,746 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
4-phase root cause debugging: understand bugs before fixing.
langsmith-observability
LLM observability platform for tracing, evaluation, and monitoring. Use when debugging LLM applications, evaluating model outputs against datasets, monitoring production systems, or building systematic testing pipelines for AI applications.
experimental-code-coverage-local-debugger
Runs code coverage locally via Universal Test Runner (UTR) or helper scripts, mimicking LUCI trybots. Activate when CQ tryjobs fail or underreport coverage, to test local GN/recipe repairs before uploading, or to debug hermetic crashes.
adversarial-reviewer
Adversarial code review that assumes bugs exist and hunts for them. Use when asked to review code, find bugs, audit for correctness, stress-test a PR, or when someone says "tear this apart" or "what's wrong with this". Give no benefit of the doubt — every line is guilty until proven innocent.
cli-e2e
Write, modify, or debug Docker-based Composio CLI end-to-end tests under ts/e2e-tests/cli, including binary invocation, fixture isolation, output assertions, and package manifests. Use for CLI E2E test suites only; use cli-command for CLI source implementation.
work
Deliver one maintainer-approved EmDash issue, choosing the bug-fix path for a defect and the direct implementation path for an enhancement or task.