Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add boparaiamrit/skills-by-amrit --skill using-skillsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/boparaiamrit/skills-by-amritWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/boparaiamrit/skills-by-amrit/using-skills)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/boparaiamrit/skills-by-amrit/using-skills"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/boparaiamrit/skills-by-amrit/using-skills/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/boparaiamrit/skills-by-amrit/using-skills"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/boparaiamrit/skills-by-amrit/using-skills.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.01292 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00646 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00258 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00129 |
Grade A, and why
using-skills scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 168 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Using Skills
Overview
Skills are not optional reading — they are mandatory workflows when their activation conditions are met.
Core principle: If a skill exists for your situation, you MUST use it. Not using it is a process violation.
The Iron Law
IF A SKILL EXISTS FOR YOUR SITUATION, YOU MUST USE IT. NO EXCEPTIONS.
When to Use
- Before starting any task (check if a skill applies)
- When composing multiple skills for complex work
- When unsure which skill applies
When NOT to Use
This is a meta-skill. It's always relevant. Check it before every task.
Anti-Shortcut Rules
YOU CANNOT:
- Skip checking for applicable skills — check before EVERY task
- Cherry-pick parts of a skill — follow it completely or not at all
- Say "I know the gist" and skip reading SKILL.md — read it fully every time
- Override Iron Laws with rationalizations — Iron Laws are absolute
- Skip a skill because "this task is simple" — simple tasks have applicable skills too
- Use a skill partially and claim you followed it — partial compliance ≠ compliance
- Deviate from a skill without documenting why and getting approval
How Skills Work
Automatic Activation
Skills activate when their description field matches the current situation:
# In each SKILL.md:
description: "Use when debugging any technical issue..."
Before every task, check: Does a skill exist for this?
Skill Composition
Skills compose naturally. A typical feature implementation activates:
brainstorming → Understand requirements
↓
writing-plans → Create implementation plan
↓
executing-plans → Execute task by task
├── test-driven-development → Per-task TDD cycle
├── verification-before-completion → After each task
└── git-workflow → Atomic commits
↓
code-review → Review all changes
↓
verification-before-completion → Final verification
Common Compositions
| Scenario | Skill Chain |
|---|---|
| New feature | brainstorming → writing-plans → executing-plans |
| Bug fix | systematic-debugging → test-driven-development → verification-before-completion |
| Full audit | codebase-mapping → architecture-audit + security-audit + performance-audit + database-audit |
| Refactoring | codebase-mapping → architecture-audit → refactoring-safely |
| Production incident | incident-response → systematic-debugging → test-driven-development |
| New API endpoint | brainstorming → api-design-audit → writing-plans → executing-plans |
| Frontend feature | brainstorming → frontend-audit → writing-plans → executing-plans |
| Deep quality check | product-completeness-audit → brutal-exhaustive-audit |
| API integration | full-stack-api-integration → verification-before-completion |
| Documentation | writing-documentation → code-review |
| Multi-role task | agent-team-coordination → (skills per role) |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 168 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A 9bffc323d1cf
using-skills is a skill published in the GitHub repository boparaiamrit/skills-by-amrit (5 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 1,292 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
insight-error-page
Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…