Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add borghei/Claude-Skills --skill pr-review-expertgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/borghei/Claude-SkillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/borghei/claude-skills/pr-review-expert)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/borghei/claude-skills/pr-review-expert"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/borghei/claude-skills/pr-review-expert/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/borghei/claude-skills/pr-review-expert"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/borghei/claude-skills/pr-review-expert.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00049 | $0.01288 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00515 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00258 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00129 |
Grade A, and why
pr-review-expert scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 25d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What ships with it
6 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 25d ago First seen · 80 lines · 49 tokens per session scan A 0815cea1b124
pr-review-expert is a skill published in the GitHub repository borghei/Claude-Skills (928 stars, last pushed 9d ago), with no licence file. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 1,288 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-22.
Other skills, from other repositories
cdd-dev
Independent cdd-dev orchestrator -- Node-anchored flow with digraph as single control-flow source of truth. Determines base via the engine artifact, dispatches the CDD implement / review / fix chain following the engine's next: line, and runs the branch final review — the engine's next face carries the pipeline…
meta-reviewing-ai-reviewing
AI integration review patterns. Use when reviewing model API calls, prompt construction, LLM output handling, RAG pipelines, and tool-calling code. Covers prompt-injection call-chain tracing, output validation, stop reasons, token budgets, retry and timeout handling, streaming, and key/PII exposure.
meta-reviewing-api-reviewing
Backend code review — injection and SSRF, boundary validation, object-level authorization, mass assignment and data exposure, error leakage, N+1 and unbounded queries. Use when a diff touches API routes or handlers, database access, auth middleware, or server code that reads files, starts processes or fetches URLs.
meta-reviewing-cli-reviewing
CLI code review — exit codes, cancellation and signals, non-TTY behaviour, the stdout/stderr split, error text, config precedence, subprocess safety and test adequacy. Load when reviewing a command-line tool's commands, entry point, prompts, output or tests, whichever parser or prompt library it uses.
meta-reviewing-infra-reviewing
Infrastructure code review — supply-chain pinning, secret exposure, workflow triggers and untrusted input, container hygiene, deployment safety. Load when reviewing a diff that touches CI/CD workflows, Dockerfiles, deployment configs or IaC.
meta-reviewing-web-reviewing
React component review — hook rules, effect cleanup, derived state, keys, memoization evidence and keyboard access. Load when reviewing a diff that adds or changes React components or hooks.