Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add bosens-China/tc39-atlas --skill chinese-article-writinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bosens-China/tc39-atlasWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/bosens-china/tc39-atlas/chinese-article-writing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bosens-china/tc39-atlas/chinese-article-writing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bosens-china/tc39-atlas/chinese-article-writing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bosens-china/tc39-atlas/chinese-article-writing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bosens-china/tc39-atlas/chinese-article-writing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00062 | $0.00905 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00031 | $0.00452 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00181 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00090 |
Grade A, and why
chinese-article-writing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
中文文章书写助手
本技能用于指导中文文章的书写，解决“不知道如何写、只能凭感觉写”的问题。 内容分为写作语气、写作流程和写作规范。请根据任务按需读取参考文件，不要默认加载全部 references。
适用场景
当用户需要以下任务时，使用本技能：
- 编写中文技术文章、博客或技术分享
- 规范或润色已有中文文档
- 统一文章风格与结构
- 提高文章的专业性与可读性
- 修复文章中的语气不一致问题
- 修正错别字、病句、用词不当
- 统一英文大小写、术语与格式
使用流程
根据用户需求，选择以下执行方式：
生成或重写模式
- 明确文章类型与目标读者
- 判断是否需要读取语气示例
- 按任务类型读取对应写作规范
- 生成完整文章或重写指定内容
修复与校对模式
- 通读用户提供的全文或指定段落
- 统一整体语气，避免前后风格不一致
- 修复以下常见问题：
- 错别字与明显病句
- 英文与缩写的大小写不一致
- 技术术语前后不统一
- 口语化、模糊或不精确表达
- 在不改变原意的前提下提升清晰度与专业度
参考文件选择
按任务选择参考文件，不要为了普通润色或短文本修复加载全部文件：
- 标题、层级、目录命名：读取 标题规范
- 句子、字间距、英文处理、表达风格：读取 文本规范
- 段落组织、引用、段落长度：读取 段落规范
- 数字、百分比、货币、范围表达：读取 数值规范
- 标点、引号、括号、破折号、省略号：读取 标点符号规范
- 技术文档、手册、知识库结构：读取 文档体系规范
- 长文写作、技术分享、需要模仿语气时：读取 语气示例
sample-article.md 只用于参考表达节奏、段落组织和技术叙述语气，不要复用其中的主题、观点或具体内容。
中文写作规范
中文技术文档应优先保证清晰、准确、克制和一致。修改文章时，先保持原意，再优化结构和表达。
常见写作问题修复规范
在修复与校对模式下，请遵循以下原则：
语气
- 保持全文语气一致（技术理性 / 分享叙述 / 教学说明）
- 避免同一篇文章中混用口语与正式书面语
- 避免情绪化或夸张表达（除非是分享类文章）
错别字与病句
- 修正明显错别字
- 调整语序不通顺的句子
- 删除重复或冗余表达
大小写与格式
- 英文缩写统一大小写（如 API、HTTP、i18n）
- 中英文之间保留适当空格
- 数字与单位格式保持一致
术语一致性
- 同一概念只使用一种表述
- 首次出现时可给出全称，后续使用简称
What ships with it
8 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 89 lines · 62 tokens per session scan A 56014af47729
chinese-article-writing is a skill published in the GitHub repository bosens-China/tc39-atlas (0 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 62 tokens to every session and 905 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
create-pr
Creates a GitHub PR with a Linear-ticket-prefixed title and a decision-led, narrative description for Prisma 8. Use when the user wants to create a pull request, open a PR, or submit changes for review.
triage-contributor-pr
Triage open pull requests from external contributors to prisma/prisma and produce a per-PR verdict with evidence. Use when a maintainer asks to triage, evaluate, assess, or review the queue of incoming contributor PRs, to decide whether a fork PR is safe to run CI on, to check whether a PR is in scope for its version…
contrib-pr
Open a high-quality external contributor PR against prisma/orm. Use when the user is an outside contributor (not a Prisma maintainer) and wants to submit a change as a pull request from a fork. Encodes the contribution flow from CONTRIBUTING.md so the resulting PR passes review on the first round.
github-review-iteration
Orchestrates a GitHub PR review loop by delegating triage and implementation to dedicated sub-agents, then repeating until actionable review items are cleared. Use when the user says “address PR review”, “triage review comments”, or “iterate until review is clean”.
publish-npm-version
Cuts the next release of Prisma 8: bumps the root package.json version (on the v8 RC line: 8.0.0-rc.N → rc.N+1), propagates it to every workspace package, and opens a PR titled "chore(release): bump to ". When the maintainer merges the PR, the Publish to npm workflow runs automatically and ships the new version to npm…
review-implement-phase
Implements triaged review actions, commits focused fixes, and posts Done plus resolves threads. Use when the user wants only the implementation phase of the review-framework workflow.