Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add boshi-xixixi/TraeSkill --skill autoresearchgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/boshi-xixixi/TraeSkillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/boshi-xixixi/traeskill/autoresearch)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/boshi-xixixi/traeskill/autoresearch"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/boshi-xixixi/traeskill/autoresearch.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00116 | $0.02571 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00058 | $0.01286 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00514 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00257 |
Grade A, and why
autoresearch scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
5 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- autoresearch — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- autoresearch — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- autoresearch — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- autoresearch — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- autoresearch — 100% identical, 1 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 276 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Autoresearch: Autonomous Iterative Experimentation
An autonomous experimentation loop for any programming task. You define the goal and how to measure it; the agent iterates autonomously -- modifying code, running experiments, measuring results, and keeping or discarding changes -- until interrupted.
This skill is inspired by Karpathy's autoresearch, generalized from ML training to any programming task with a measurable outcome.
Agent Behavior Rules
- DO guide the user through the Setup phase interactively before starting the loop.
- DO establish a baseline measurement before making any changes.
- DO commit every experiment attempt before running it (so it can be reverted cleanly).
- DO keep a results log (TSV) tracking every experiment.
- DO revert changes that do not improve the metric (git reset to last known good).
- DO run autonomously once the loop starts -- never pause to ask "should I continue?".
- DO NOT modify files the user marked as out-of-scope.
- DO NOT skip the measurement step -- every experiment must be measured.
- DO NOT keep changes that regress the metric unless the user explicitly allowed trade-offs.
- DO NOT install new dependencies or make environment changes unless the user approved it.
Phase 1: Setup (Interactive)
Before any experimentation begins, work with the user to establish these parameters. Ask the user directly for each item. Do not assume or skip any.
1.1 Define the Goal
Ask the user:
What are you trying to improve or optimize?
Examples: execution time, memory usage, binary size, test pass rate, code coverage, API response latency, throughput, error rate, benchmark score, build time, bundle size, lines of code, cyclomatic complexity, etc.
Record the user's answer as the goal.
1.2 Define the Metric
Ask the user:
How do we measure success? What exact command produces the metric?
I need:
- The command to run (e.g.,
dotnet test,npm run benchmark,time ./build.sh,pytest --tb=short)- How to extract the metric from the output (e.g., a regex pattern, a specific line, a JSON field)
- Direction: Is lower better or higher better?
Example: "Run
dotnet test --logger trx, count passing tests. Higher is better." Example: "Runhyperfine './my-program', extract mean time. Lower is better."
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 276 lines · 116 tokens per session scan A 754179e98751
autoresearch is a skill published in the GitHub repository boshi-xixixi/TraeSkill (261 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 116 tokens to every session and 2,571 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
testing
A guide for writing tests that check observable behaviour rather than the code's internal structure. Tests are repeatable checks that confirm software still gives the expected result after changes.
verify-and-fix
A development practice for checking that code really works before calling it finished. It uses tests, type checks, and real runs of the target scenario where available.
verification-before-completion
A checklist for verifying work before claiming that it is finished, fixed, built, tested, or ready to submit. It requires fresh command output and evidence for each claim.
writing-skills
A guide for creating and testing reusable instructions for AI agents, called skills. It applies test-driven development, or TDD—the practice of writing tests before implementation—to instruction documents.
test-driven-development
Test-driven development, or TDD, is a way to build software by writing a test that fails, adding the smallest code that makes it pass, and then cleaning up the code. These instructions require that process for features, bug fixes, refactors, and behavior changes.
prompt-proximity-architecture
Turn an approved measurement charter, ICPs, and buyer jobs into a budget-aware prompt coverage blueprint across proximity bands, aided status, information acts, journey states, roles, locales, evidence grades, partitions, and measurement lanes. Use before prompt wording to define required, optional, and prohibited…