Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add boshi-xixixi/TraeSkill --skill create-github-issues-feature-from-implementation-plangit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/boshi-xixixi/TraeSkillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/boshi-xixixi/traeskill/create-github-issues-feature-from-implementation-plan)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/boshi-xixixi/traeskill/create-github-issues-feature-from-implementation-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/boshi-xixixi/traeskill/create-github-issues-feature-from-implementation-plan/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/boshi-xixixi/traeskill/create-github-issues-feature-from-implementation-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/boshi-xixixi/traeskill/create-github-issues-feature-from-implementation-plan.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00029 | $0.00193 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00097 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00039 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00019 |
Grade A, and why
create-github-issues-feature-from-implementation-plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Create GitHub Issue from Implementation Plan
Create GitHub Issues for the implementation plan at ${file}.
Process
- Analyze plan file to identify phases
- Check existing issues using
search_issues - Create new issue per phase using
create_issueor update existing withupdate_issue - Use
feature_request.ymlorchore_request.ymltemplates (fallback to default)
Requirements
- One issue per implementation phase
- Clear, structured titles and descriptions
- Include only changes required by the plan
- Verify against existing issues before creation
Issue Content
- Title: Phase name from implementation plan
- Description: Phase details, requirements, and context
- Labels: Appropriate for issue type (feature/chore)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 29 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A 6cc82a68a659
create-github-issues-feature-from-implementation-plan is a skill published in the GitHub repository boshi-xixixi/TraeSkill (263 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 193 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
to-issues
A planning aid that breaks a PRD or technical specification into small implementation issues, each covering a complete, demonstrable piece of work.
fable-orchestrate
Use when the user wants a task decomposed and driven by a Fable 5.1 orchestrator delegating implementation to Sonnet 5 workers. Fable decomposes into self-contained specs, dispatches Sonnet workers (Agents for 1–2 pieces, a Workflow for fan-out), reviews each result, merges into one branch, and takes a binding verdict…
fable-validate-fableplan-loop
Use when the user asks to validate a GitHub issue with Fable 5.1, always plan it with Fable 5.1, and autonomously drive it to a reviewed PR in one shot — "fable-validate-fableplan-loop", "fable validate, fable plan, and work on.
fable-validate-loop
Use when the user asks to validate a GitHub issue with Fable 5.1 and then autonomously drive it to a reviewed PR in one shot — "fable-validate-loop", "fable validate and work on.
milestoneplan
Use when the user wants a milestone's execution plan shown as a table — "milestoneplan v1", "/milestoneplan", "show the plan for v1". Read-only - reads every issue in the milestone and renders one table of issue number, description, complexity, dependencies, validate/build model and effort, fableplan, plan effort, and…
new-issue
Use when the user says "new issue", "create an issue", "file an issue", "/new-issue", or asks to turn a bug, idea, or discussion into a GitHub issue. Takes an optional description of what the issue should cover; with no input, derives the issue from what was discussed in the current conversation. Verifies claims…