Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add boshi-xixixi/TraeSkill --skill generate-custom-instructions-from-codebasegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/boshi-xixixi/TraeSkillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/boshi-xixixi/traeskill/generate-custom-instructions-from-codebase)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/boshi-xixixi/traeskill/generate-custom-instructions-from-codebase"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/boshi-xixixi/traeskill/generate-custom-instructions-from-codebase/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/boshi-xixixi/traeskill/generate-custom-instructions-from-codebase"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/boshi-xixixi/traeskill/generate-custom-instructions-from-codebase.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00059 | $0.01813 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00907 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00363 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00181 |
Grade A, and why
generate-custom-instructions-from-codebase scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- custom-instructions-from-codebase — 94% identical, 2 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 241 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Migration and Code Evolution Instructions Generator
Configuration Variables
${MIGRATION_TYPE="Framework Version|Architecture Refactoring|Technology Migration|Dependencies Update|Pattern Changes"}
<!-- Type of migration or evolution -->
${SOURCE_REFERENCE="branch|commit|tag"}
<!-- Source reference point (before state) -->
${TARGET_REFERENCE="branch|commit|tag"}
<!-- Target reference point (after state) -->
${ANALYSIS_SCOPE="Entire project|Specific folder|Modified files only"}
<!-- Scope of analysis -->
${CHANGE_FOCUS="Breaking Changes|New Conventions|Obsolete Patterns|API Changes|Configuration"}
<!-- Main aspect of changes -->
${AUTOMATION_LEVEL="Conservative|Balanced|Aggressive"}
<!-- Level of automation for Copilot suggestions -->
${GENERATE_EXAMPLES="true|false"}
<!-- Include transformation examples -->
${VALIDATION_REQUIRED="true|false"}
<!-- Require validation before application -->
Generated Prompt
"Analyze code evolution between two project states to generate precise migration instructions for GitHub Copilot. These instructions will guide Copilot to automatically apply the same transformation patterns during future modifications. Follow this methodology:
### Phase 1: Comparative State Analysis
#### Structural Changes Detection
- Compare folder structure between ${SOURCE_REFERENCE} and ${TARGET_REFERENCE}
- Identify moved, renamed, or deleted files
- Analyze changes in configuration files
- Document new dependencies and removed ones
#### Code Transformation Analysis
${MIGRATION_TYPE == "Framework Version" ?
"- Identify API changes between framework versions
- Analyze new features being used
- Document obsolete methods/properties
- Note syntax or convention changes" : ""}
${MIGRATION_TYPE == "Architecture Refactoring" ?
"- Analyze architectural pattern changes
- Identify new abstractions introduced
- Document responsibility reorganization
- Note changes in data flows" : ""}
${MIGRATION_TYPE == "Technology Migration" ?
"- Analyze replacement of one technology with another
- Identify functional equivalences
- Document API and syntax changes
- Note new dependencies and configurations" : ""}
#### Transformation Pattern Extraction
- Identify repetitive transformations applied
- Analyze conversion rules from old to new format
- Document exceptions and special cases
- Create before/after correspondence matrix
### Phase 2: Migration Instructions Generation
Create a `.github/copilot-migration-instructions.md` file with this structure:
\`\`\`markdown
# GitHub Copilot Migration Instructions
## Migration Context
- **Type**: ${MIGRATION_TYPE}
- **From**: ${SOURCE_REFERENCE}
- **To**: ${TARGET_REFERENCE}
- **Date**: [GENERATION_DATE]
- **Scope**: ${ANALYSIS_SCOPE}
## Automatic Transformation Rules
### 1. Mandatory Transformations
${AUTOMATION_LEVEL != "Conservative" ?
"[AUTOMATIC_TRANSFORMATION_RULES]
- **Old Pattern**: [OLD_CODE]
- **New Pattern**: [NEW_CODE]
- **Trigger**: When to detect this pattern
- **Action**: Transformation to apply automatically" : ""}
### 2. Transformations with Validation
${VALIDATION_REQUIRED == "true" ?
"[TRANSFORMATIONS_WITH_VALIDATION]
- **Detected Pattern**: [DESCRIPTION]
- **Suggested Transformation**: [NEW_APPROACH]
- **Required Validation**: [VALIDATION_CRITERIA]
- **Alternatives**: [ALTERNATIVE_OPTIONS]" : ""}
### 3. API Correspondences
${CHANGE_FOCUS == "API Changes" || MIGRATION_TYPE == "Framework Version" ?
"[API_CORRESPONDENCE_TABLE]
| Old API | New API | Notes | Example |
| --------- | --------- | --------- | -------------- |
| [OLD_API] | [NEW_API] | [CHANGES] | [CODE_EXAMPLE] | " : ""} |
### 4. New Patterns to Adopt
[DETECTED_EMERGING_PATTERNS]
- **Pattern**: [PATTERN_NAME]
- **Usage**: [WHEN_TO_USE]
- **Implementation**: [HOW_TO_IMPLEMENT]
- **Benefits**: [ADVANTAGES]
### 5. Obsolete Patterns to Avoid
[DETECTED_OBSOLETE_PATTERNS]
- **Obsolete Pattern**: [OLD_PATTERN]
- **Why Avoid**: [REASONS]
- **Alternative**: [NEW_PATTERN]
- **Migration**: [CONVERSION_STEPS]
## File Type Specific Instructions
${GENERATE_EXAMPLES == "true" ?
"### Configuration Files
[CONFIG_TRANSFORMATION_EXAMPLES]
### Main Source Files
[SOURCE_TRANSFORMATION_EXAMPLES]
### Test Files
[TEST_TRANSFORMATION_EXAMPLES]" : ""}
## Validation and Security
### Automatic Control Points
- Verifications to perform after each transformation
- Tests to run to validate changes
- Performance metrics to monitor
- Compatibility checks to perform
### Manual Escalation
Situations requiring human intervention:
- [COMPLEX_CASES_LIST]
- [ARCHITECTURAL_DECISIONS]
- [BUSINESS_IMPACTS]
## Migration Monitoring
### Tracking Metrics
- Percentage of code automatically migrated
- Number of manual validations required
- Error rate of automatic transformations
- Average migration time per file
### Error Reporting
How to report incorrect transformations to Copilot:
- Feedback patterns to improve rules
- Exceptions to document
- Adjustments to make to instructions
\`\`\`
### Phase 3: Contextual Examples Generation
${GENERATE_EXAMPLES == "true" ?
"#### Transformation Examples
For each identified pattern, generate:
\`\`\`
// BEFORE (${SOURCE_REFERENCE})
[OLD_CODE_EXAMPLE]
// AFTER (${TARGET_REFERENCE})
[NEW_CODE_EXAMPLE]
// COPILOT INSTRUCTIONS
When you see this pattern [TRIGGER], transform it to [NEW_PATTERN] following these steps: [STEPS]
\`\`\`" : ""}
### Phase 4: Validation and Optimization
#### Instructions Testing
- Apply instructions on test code
- Verify transformation consistency
- Adjust rules based on results
- Document exceptions and edge cases
#### Iterative Optimization
${AUTOMATION_LEVEL == "Aggressive" ?
"- Refine rules to maximize automation
- Reduce false positives in detection
- Improve transformation accuracy
- Document lessons learned" : ""}
### Final Result
Migration instructions that enable GitHub Copilot to:
1. **Automatically apply** the same transformations during future modifications
2. **Maintain consistency** with newly adopted conventions
3. **Avoid obsolete patterns** by automatically proposing alternatives
4. **Accelerate future migrations** by capitalizing on acquired experience
5. **Reduce errors** by automating repetitive transformations
These instructions transform Copilot into an intelligent migration assistant, capable of reproducing your technology evolution decisions consistently and reliably.
"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 241 lines · 59 tokens per session scan A b0be02c9acdb
generate-custom-instructions-from-codebase is a skill published in the GitHub repository boshi-xixixi/TraeSkill (262 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 59 tokens to every session and 1,813 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
<skill-name>
A template for defining a coding-agent skill, including its title, trigger situations, overview, workflow, common mistakes, and optional references.
spec-writing
A method for writing a software specification: a document that records decisions, reasons, boundaries, and ways to judge whether implementation succeeded. It first checks whether important unknowns require user clarification or technical research.
onboarding-unknown-codebase
A method for quickly understanding an unfamiliar codebase, meaning a software project whose structure and behavior you do not yet know. It builds a project map by examining overview files, directories, and one main execution path.
commit-message
A guide for writing clear, traceable Git commit messages using the Conventional Commits format, which labels changes such as features, bug fixes, documentation, and refactoring.
clarifying-questions
Guidance for clarifying vague or assumption-heavy requests before making changes.
debugging
A systematic method for finding the underlying cause of a software bug by observing the failure, forming a hypothesis, and testing it.