gtm-enterprise-account-planning

gtm-enterprise-account-planning is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from boshi-xixixi/TraeSkill. It costs 57 tokens per session (3,570 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A framework for planning and managing complex enterprise sales deals with multiple stakeholders and long buying processes. It includes MEDDICC, a sales qualification method, and a mutual action plan, which is a shared list of steps and dates for closing a deal.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to build account plans, track deal health, coordinate legal or security reviews, qualify opportunities, and maintain shared closing plans.
Why use it?
It helps reveal when a deal is genuinely progressing, when important people are missing, and when a sales team is wasting time on a stalled opportunity.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: installed under .agents/ (shared by several agents).

Good fit Use it to build account plans, track deal health, coordinate legal or security reviews, qualify opportunities, and maintain shared closing plans.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/boshi-xixixi/traeskill/gtm-enterprise-account-planning
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add boshi-xixixi/TraeSkill --skill gtm-enterprise-account-planning
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/boshi-xixixi/TraeSkill

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for gtm-enterprise-account-planning

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/boshi-xixixi/traeskill/gtm-enterprise-account-planning/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/boshi-xixixi/traeskill/gtm-enterprise-account-planning)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/boshi-xixixi/traeskill/gtm-enterprise-account-planning"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/boshi-xixixi/traeskill/gtm-enterprise-account-planning/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for gtm-enterprise-account-planning

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/boshi-xixixi/traeskill/gtm-enterprise-account-planning"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/boshi-xixixi/traeskill/gtm-enterprise-account-planning.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 57 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 3,570 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00057 $0.03570
Opus 5 $0.00028 $0.01785
Sonnet 5 $0.00011 $0.00714
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00357

Measured 8d ago against content hash 92441114f77b, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

gtm-enterprise-account-planning scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

Copies of this mod

1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:

.trae/Skills/.agents/skills/gtm-enterprise-account-planning/SKILL.md · 430 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 430 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Enterprise Account Planning

Strategic account planning and execution for enterprise deals. Turn complex sales cycles into systematic wins — or at least know when they're dying before you waste months.

When to Use

Triggers:

  • "How do I plan this enterprise deal?"
  • "This deal has been in motion 3 months, why isn't it closing?"
  • "Should I create a full account plan or simplified version?"
  • "How do I know if this deal is actually moving?"
  • "MEDDICC qualification"
  • "Building a mutual action plan"

Context:

  • Strategic deals above your average ACV
  • Multiple stakeholders involved
  • Sales cycle exceeds 60 days
  • Complex buying process (legal, procurement, security)
  • Enterprise or mid-market accounts

Core Frameworks

1. If Your MAP Hasn't Been Updated in 3 Weeks, That Deal Is Dead

The Pattern I've Seen:

The Mutual Action Plan (MAP) is the single best indicator of deal health. Not pipeline stage. Not verbal commitments. Not "they love the product."

The MAP tells you everything:

Healthy deal:

  • MAP updated weekly
  • Customer adding their own action items
  • Both sides completing tasks on schedule
  • New stakeholders appearing in MAP
  • Dates moving up (not pushed out)

Dying deal:

  • MAP last updated 3+ weeks ago
  • Only your side has action items
  • Customer tasks marked "pending" for weeks
  • No new stakeholders engaged
  • All dates in the past

Why This Happens:

When a deal is real, the customer wants it to happen. They're doing work. They're involving stakeholders. They're moving through their process.

When a deal is dying, you're doing all the work. They're "too busy." They'll "get back to you next week." The economic buyer is "traveling."

The 3-Week Rule:

If your MAP hasn't been updated in 3 weeks, the deal is dead — you just don't know it yet. I've never seen a deal close with a stale MAP. Not once in 11 years.

What to Do:

Week 1 of silence: Send MAP update: "Here's what we've completed. What's your status on [specific customer action]?"

Read the full file on GitHub · 430 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 8d ago First seen · 430 lines · 57 tokens per session scan A 92441114f77b

Subscribe to this mod's changes

gtm-enterprise-account-planning is a skill published in the GitHub repository boshi-xixixi/TraeSkill (263 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 57 tokens to every session and 3,570 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

to-issues

A planning aid that breaks a PRD or technical specification into small implementation issues, each covering a complete, demonstrable piece of work.

smallnest/goal-workflow · 96 tokens

fable-orchestrate

Use when the user wants a task decomposed and driven by a Fable 5.1 orchestrator delegating implementation to Sonnet 5 workers. Fable decomposes into self-contained specs, dispatches Sonnet workers (Agents for 1–2 pieces, a Workflow for fan-out), reviews each result, merges into one branch, and takes a binding verdict…

richkuo/rk-skills · 115 tokens

fable-validate-loop

Use when the user asks to validate a GitHub issue with Fable 5.1 and then autonomously drive it to a reviewed PR in one shot — "fable-validate-loop", "fable validate and work on.

richkuo/rk-skills · 52 tokens

fable-validate-fableplan-loop

Use when the user asks to validate a GitHub issue with Fable 5.1, always plan it with Fable 5.1, and autonomously drive it to a reviewed PR in one shot — "fable-validate-fableplan-loop", "fable validate, fable plan, and work on.

richkuo/rk-skills · 74 tokens

milestoneplan

Use when the user wants a milestone's execution plan shown as a table — "milestoneplan v1", "/milestoneplan", "show the plan for v1". Read-only - reads every issue in the milestone and renders one table of issue number, description, complexity, dependencies, validate/build model and effort, fableplan, plan effort, and…

richkuo/rk-skills · 100 tokens

new-issue

Use when the user says "new issue", "create an issue", "file an issue", "/new-issue", or asks to turn a bug, idea, or discussion into a GitHub issue. Takes an optional description of what the issue should cover; with no input, derives the issue from what was discussed in the current conversation. Verifies claims…

richkuo/rk-skills · 94 tokens