Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add boshi-xixixi/TraeSkill --skill meeting-minutesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/boshi-xixixi/TraeSkillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/boshi-xixixi/traeskill/meeting-minutes)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/boshi-xixixi/traeskill/meeting-minutes"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/boshi-xixixi/traeskill/meeting-minutes/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/boshi-xixixi/traeskill/meeting-minutes"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/boshi-xixixi/traeskill/meeting-minutes.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00036 | $0.01837 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00919 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00367 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00184 |
Grade A, and why
meeting-minutes scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
2 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- meeting-minutes — 94% identical, 8 lines differ
- meeting-minutes — 84% identical, 58 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 236 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Meeting Minutes Skill — Short Internal Meetings
Purpose / Overview
This Skill produces high-quality, consistent meeting minutes for internal meetings that are 60 minutes or shorter. Output is designed to be clear, actionable, and easy to convert into task trackers (e.g., GitHub Issues, Jira). The generated minutes prioritize decisions and action items so teams can move quickly from discussion to execution.
When to Use
Use this skill when:
- Internal syncs, standups, design reviews, triage, planning or ad-hoc meetings with short duration
- Situations that require a concise record of decisions, assigned action items, and follow-ups
- Creating a standardized minutes document from a live meeting, transcript, recording, or notes
Operational Workflow
Phase 1: Intake (before drafting)
- Obtain meeting metadata: title, date, start/end time (or duration), organizer, and intended audience.
- Confirm available inputs: agenda, slides, recording, transcript, or raw notes.
- If key details are missing, ask up to 3 clarifying questions before producing minutes (see "Discovery" below).
Phase 2: Capture (during / immediately after meeting)
- Record attendees and absentees.
- Capture brief notes per agenda item with time markers if available.
- Record explicit decisions, rationale summary (1–2 sentences), and action items (owner + due date).
Phase 3: Drafting
- Generate minutes following the Strict Minutes Schema (below).
- Ensure every action item includes owner, due date (or timeframe), and acceptance criteria when applicable.
- Mark unresolved issues or items requiring follow-up in the Parking Lot.
Phase 4: Review & Publish
- If possible, send draft to meeting organizer or a designated reviewer for quick verification (within 24 hours).
- Publish final minutes to the agreed channel (shared drive, repo, ticket, or email) and optionally create tasks in the team's tracker.
Discovery (required clarifying questions)
Before generating minutes, the agent MUST ask up to three clarifying questions if any of these are missing:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 236 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A 69420bbe78b2
meeting-minutes is a skill published in the GitHub repository boshi-xixixi/TraeSkill (263 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 1,837 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
to-issues
A planning aid that breaks a PRD or technical specification into small implementation issues, each covering a complete, demonstrable piece of work.
fable-orchestrate
Use when the user wants a task decomposed and driven by a Fable 5.1 orchestrator delegating implementation to Sonnet 5 workers. Fable decomposes into self-contained specs, dispatches Sonnet workers (Agents for 1–2 pieces, a Workflow for fan-out), reviews each result, merges into one branch, and takes a binding verdict…
fable-validate-loop
Use when the user asks to validate a GitHub issue with Fable 5.1 and then autonomously drive it to a reviewed PR in one shot — "fable-validate-loop", "fable validate and work on.
fable-validate-fableplan-loop
Use when the user asks to validate a GitHub issue with Fable 5.1, always plan it with Fable 5.1, and autonomously drive it to a reviewed PR in one shot — "fable-validate-fableplan-loop", "fable validate, fable plan, and work on.
milestoneplan
Use when the user wants a milestone's execution plan shown as a table — "milestoneplan v1", "/milestoneplan", "show the plan for v1". Read-only - reads every issue in the milestone and renders one table of issue number, description, complexity, dependencies, validate/build model and effort, fableplan, plan effort, and…
new-issue
Use when the user says "new issue", "create an issue", "file an issue", "/new-issue", or asks to turn a bug, idea, or discussion into a GitHub issue. Takes an optional description of what the issue should cover; with no input, derives the issue from what was discussed in the current conversation. Verifies claims…