Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/bostonaholic/team/conventional-commentsnpx skills add bostonaholic/team --skill conventional-commentsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bostonaholic/teamWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/bostonaholic/team/conventional-comments)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bostonaholic/team/conventional-comments"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bostonaholic/team/conventional-comments.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00358 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00179 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00072 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00036 |
Grade A, and why
conventional-comments scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Conventional Comments
Code, security, and docs reviewers use Conventional Comments; ux-reviewer uses Working/Broken/Could Improve. Every comment includes a specific file:line.
Comment Style
Address code, not its author; assume competence. Explain why. Reserve issue: for correctness, security, or maintainability defects; use suggestion:/nitpick: for preferences. More than ~10 substantive comments on one change indicates a design problem: propose splitting the change or continuing design discussion outside review.
Prefer “The null case is not handled here” over “You are not handling the null case.” Prefer “I cannot follow this branch—clarify?” over “This does not make sense.”
Comment Types
Every body begins with its label and decoration inside literal **...**.
issue (blocking): must be fixed before approval.
**issue (blocking):** This query interpolates user input without parameterization.
file: src/api/users.ts:42
suggestion (non-blocking): author may accept or decline.
**suggestion (non-blocking):** Consider extracting this validation into a shared utility.
file: src/handlers/create.ts:18
nitpick (non-blocking): minor style/naming; never blocks.
**nitpick (non-blocking):** "data" is too vague — consider "userProfile" to match the domain.
file: src/models/types.ts:7
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today Changed · -21 lines · -28 tokens per session a974ddf26702
- 5d ago First seen · 62 lines · 54 tokens per session scan A 65fbf1c500d3
conventional-comments is a skill published in the GitHub repository bostonaholic/team (11 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 358 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
tutti-app-release
Set up, review, run, or debug external repositories that publish a Tutti workspace app through the reusable Tutti App Release GitHub Actions workflow. Use for caller workflows, tutti.app.json manifests, @tutti-os/app-release-tools, S3/CloudFront release hosting, latest.json, versions.json, catalog.json, catalog-only…
analyze-performance-traces
Analyze Chrome, Chromium, Electron, React DevTools, or Perfetto-compatible JSON traces and audit user-reported profiling findings without loading large artifacts into context; prove trigger-to-render/layout chains, separate measured facts from source inference, find exact code choke points, classify forced layout and…
tutti-test-audit
Audit, design, write, materially revise, or remove Tutti tests. Use whenever Codex changes or reviews unit, component, conformance, integration, regression, platform, or repository tests; enforce a protected product contract, credible failure, correct owning boundary, negative-control evidence, overlap review…
tutti-agent-workspace-app
Build or evolve a complex agent-enabled Tutti workspace app repository. Use for Tutti apps with web/server/shared monorepos, @tutti-os/agent-acp-kit local agent runtimes, kit-owned TUTTICLI agent/composer discovery, dynamic agent catalogs, run-scoped MCP tool gateways, app-owned package builders, web-first debugging…
assimilate-popular-workflows
This skill should be used when the user asks to "find skills in the wild", "assimilate popular workflows", "discover SKILL.md files in repos", "research external skills", "find workflow patterns", "survey the skill landscape", "what skills exist out there", or wants to investigate public repositories for extractable…
process-builder
Scaffold new babysitter process definitions following SDK patterns, proper structure, and best practices. Guides the 3-phase workflow from research to implementation.