Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add bostonaholic/team --skill principle-generator-evaluatorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bostonaholic/teamWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/bostonaholic/team/principle-generator-evaluator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bostonaholic/team/principle-generator-evaluator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bostonaholic/team/principle-generator-evaluator/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bostonaholic/team/principle-generator-evaluator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bostonaholic/team/principle-generator-evaluator.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00026 | $0.00177 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00088 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00035 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00018 |
Grade A, and why
principle-generator-evaluator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Generator–Evaluator Separation
The agent that produced the work never evaluates it; use Veto without authorship from a fresh-context judge with no shared producer history.
- Give evaluators the artifact and upstream spec, never production discussion or author narration.
- Convey intent only through artifacts written before the work existed.
- Let evaluators report defects and change nothing; let producers change work and cast no verdict.
- Require both roles to close a review cycle.
- Have evaluators flag open questions without asking the producer.
- Assign one claim to one fresh judge; never reuse a checker that judged earlier claims.
- Apply
skills/reviewing-code/SKILL.mdfor code review.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago Changed · -18 lines · -16 tokens per session 83e199624e79
- 6d ago First seen · 36 lines · 42 tokens per session scan A 1dd220f1d107
principle-generator-evaluator is a skill published in the GitHub repository bostonaholic/team (11 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 177 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
codebase-sync
Convention discovery and rule generation from codebase analysis. Scans project structure, builds search indexes, identifies patterns, and generates enforceable rules.
code-review-patterns
Multi-dimensional code assessment across security, quality, performance, and maintainability with confidence-gated reporting (>=80%) and Router Contract generation.
code-review-pipeline
Multi-dimensional code review across correctness, security, performance, and maintainability with confidence-gated reporting and remediation loops.
plan-implementation
Disciplined execution of approved plans with step-by-step verification, phase checkpoints, failure investigation, and mandatory code/security reviews.
quality-checklist
Validate implementation quality through custom checklists, scoring against constitution standards, specification coverage, and producing remediation recommendations.
code-review
Multi-dimensional code review across correctness, security, performance, maintainability, and test coverage.