Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/bostonorange/claude-code-framework/merge-resolvenpx skills add BostonOrange/claude-code-framework --skill merge-resolvegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/BostonOrange/claude-code-frameworkWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/bostonorange/claude-code-framework/merge-resolve)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bostonorange/claude-code-framework/merge-resolve"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bostonorange/claude-code-framework/merge-resolve.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00036 | $0.01472 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00736 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00294 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00147 |
Grade A, and why
merge-resolve scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 184 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Merge Resolve
Resolve merge conflicts by understanding both features' intent — not just the code diff.
Usage
/merge-resolve TICKET-1234 # Resolve conflicts on TICKET-1234's PR
/merge-resolve TICKET-1234 --auto # Resolve, push, and notify automatically
When This Runs
- Factory PR can't merge — base branch has changed since PR was created
- CI workflow detects conflict — auto-merge fails
- Developer notices — PR shows merge conflicts on GitHub
Why This Is Better Than Manual Resolution
Traditional conflict resolution looks at code only — which lines overlap. This skill reads both features' story documentation to understand why each side made changes, then resolves based on intent:
- Method A was added for "invoice line item validation" (Story US-100)
- Method B was added for "batch processing of work orders" (Story US-200)
- Resolution: keep both methods — they serve different purposes
Step 1: Identify Conflicts
git fetch origin {{BASE_BRANCH}}
BRANCH="{TICKET_ID}"
git checkout "$BRANCH"
git merge origin/{{BASE_BRANCH}} --no-commit --no-ff 2>&1 | tee /tmp/merge-status.txt
# List conflicted files
git diff --name-only --diff-filter=U
If no conflicts → merge cleanly → done. Skip to Step 5.
Step 2: Understand Both Features
For each conflicted file, identify which tickets modified it:
MERGE_BASE=$(git merge-base HEAD origin/{{BASE_BRANCH}})
git log --oneline "$MERGE_BASE..origin/{{BASE_BRANCH}}" -- {conflicted_file}
For each ticket involved:
- Read
docs/stories/{OTHER_TICKET_ID}/story.md— understand the feature intent - Read
docs/stories/{OTHER_TICKET_ID}/solutions-components.md— understand what was built - Read the current ticket's equivalent docs
This gives full context on why each side made its changes.
Step 3: Resolve Conflicts
Apply resolution rules based on file type and feature intent:
Resolution Rules by File Type
| File Type | Strategy | Human Review? |
|---|---|---|
| Source code — different functions/methods | Keep both | No |
| Source code — same function modified | Merge logic based on story intent | Yes, if complex |
| Source code — imports/dependencies | Combine both sets | No |
| Configuration files | Union of both, deduplicate | No |
| Permission/access files | Union of both — never remove | No |
| Manifest/package files | Union of components, deduplicate | No |
| Schema/migration files | Keep both (may need ordering) | Yes |
| Flow/workflow files | Flag for review unless changes are in different elements | Yes |
| Test files | Keep both test cases | No |
| Test data factories/fixtures | Merge factory methods | No |
| UI components — same file | Merge based on feature intent | Yes, if complex |
| Story docs | No conflict (different ticket folders) | No |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 184 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A dda5f04b6fb4
merge-resolve is a skill published in the GitHub repository BostonOrange/claude-code-framework (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 1,472 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…