Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to boykush/scraps. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/boykush/scraps/main/.agents/skills/adr-check/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/boykush/scrapsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/boykush/scraps/adr-check)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/boykush/scraps/adr-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/boykush/scraps/adr-check/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/boykush/scraps/adr-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/boykush/scraps/adr-check.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00072 | $0.00582 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00029 | $0.00233 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00116 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00058 |
Grade A, and why
adr-check scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 23d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
ルールとの照合
boykush/adr のルールは、各リポジトリの作業が守ること。ルールを実行する仕組みは無く、変更を読んでルールに照らす。
照合は作業を終えてから行う。作業の前や途中に読むと、作業が触れないルールまでセッションに載ってノイズになる。違反を指摘されて直すときは、指摘されたルールを読んで直す。
照合する
list_rulesでルールを読む。返るのは accepted の決定のルールだけ- 文法は skill
ade-rule-dslの reference で確かめる。記憶や似た DSL から推し量らない - ルールは、それを読んだセッションが作業しているリポジトリについての言明。パスはそのリポジトリの root から当てる
- 変更が、ルールの禁じるものを足していないか、触ったファイルに残していないか、ルールの求めるものを欠いていないかを見る
- ルールが当てはまるかを決めるのに理由が要るときだけ、
get_decisionで決定を読む。id が分からなければlist_decisionsで探す。決定のうちルールに書かれていない部分は、作業を縛らない
違反があったら
- 作業を直して、ルールを満たす
- ルールを破らないと作業が成り立たないように見えたら、破らずにユーザーへ伝える。ルールを変えるのは boykush/adr で、作業しているリポジトリではない
- ルールはリポジトリ自身の慣習として扱う。コードのコメントにも commit message にも PR にも、ルールの元になった決定を名指ししない
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 23d ago First seen · 25 lines · 72 tokens per session scan A 0a96dea6cda4
adr-check is a skill published in the GitHub repository boykush/scraps (45 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 72 tokens to every session and 582 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-26.
Other skills, from other repositories
gh-compile-issues
Triage N GitHub issues into a coverage matrix: fetch each, check current code, classify already-done/quick-fix/design/defer with cited evidence.
gh-find-prs
Survey open Codewhale PRs and triage each for mergeability and disposition against the real landing branch.
review
Diff-scoped correctness review that reads the codebase around the change — callers, contracts, and invariants — and returns line-anchored findings ranked by severity with confidence, then a merge-risk verdict. Use for reviewing a PR, diff, or named change set. Not for style review, approvals-as-rubber-stamp, or…
cw-slice
Use before writing code for any Codewhale feature, upgrade, or refactor: find the existing owner of the behavior, bound the change to one reviewable slice, and fix the evidence bar before you start.
github
Skill "github" from Hmbown/Codewhale, covering github, when to use, setup, workflow and non-goals.
simplify
Improve clarity and reduce needless complexity after behavior is understood; preserve behavior and keep cleanup separate from correctness fixes.