Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/bparlan/omp-agent/example_skill_noncompliantnpx skills add bparlan/omp-agent --skill example_skill_noncompliantgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bparlan/omp-agentWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/bparlan/omp-agent/example_skill_noncompliant)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bparlan/omp-agent/example_skill_noncompliant"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bparlan/omp-agent/example_skill_noncompliant.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00070 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00035 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00014 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00007 |
Grade A, and why
example_skill_noncompliant scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 11 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 6cdff3fe016c
example_skill_noncompliant is a skill published in the GitHub repository bparlan/omp-agent (38 stars, last pushed 3d ago), with no licence file. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 70 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
Other skills, from other repositories
speq-implement
Orchestrate implementation of a reviewed plan: task breakdown, TDD sub-agents, code review, and verification report. Use when the user asks to implement, build, or execute a plan under specs/plans/ — after /speq-plan, before /speq-record. Arg: .
speq-plan-pr
Headless, non-interactive version of /speq-plan for CI or agent-driven runs. Plans a feature without a live interview, commits the result to a feat/plan-name branch, and opens a draft PR. If a decision genuinely needs a human, it persists the partial plan and open questions and asks in a PR comment instead of…
speq-audit
Audit a speq project's health — spec-library structure, feature/decision-log/plan validation, mission-to-spec sync, unrecorded plans, and gitignore hygiene — then guide fixes. Use when the user asks to audit, health-check, doctor, lint, or sanity-check the specs or repo, or after cloning or inheriting a speq project.
speq-code-review
Code review tag taxonomy and findings output format — guardrail violations, dead code, test quality, bad comments, optimizations, YAGNI/over-engineering, error handling, and design depth. Triggered by code-reviewer.
speq-implement-pr
Headless follow-up to /speq-plan-pr. Continues on a plan's feat/plan-name branch, runs /speq-implement, bumps the version, runs the real test suites, records only if green, then pushes, opens/updates the PR, and marks it ready. Arg: plan name, PR number, or branch name.
speq-mission
Create or update specs/mission.md through a Socratic interview; detects brownfield vs greenfield. Use when the user asks to bootstrap or initialize a speq project, write or revise the project mission, or when /speq-audit reports mission drift and seeds this skill with its findings.