Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add bravew/trove --skill trove-swiftgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bravew/troveWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/bravew/trove/trove-swift)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bravew/trove/trove-swift"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bravew/trove/trove-swift/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bravew/trove/trove-swift"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bravew/trove/trove-swift.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00045 | $0.00492 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00246 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00098 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00049 |
Grade A, and why
trove-swift scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Trove · v2026.7.4
Session Init
This skill ships Trove conventions. Prefer existing project patterns over generic best practices when they conflict.
Swift 6 / SwiftUI Conventions
@Observable (Preferred over ObservableObject)
@Observable
final class UserViewModel {
var name = ""
var isLoading = false
func load() async {
isLoading = true
defer { isLoading = false }
name = try await fetchUserName()
}
}
Use @Observable instead of ObservableObject + @Published in new code.
Async/Await
- Use structured concurrency (
async let,TaskGroup) - Annotate main-actor-bound code with
@MainActor - Use
Task { }only at boundaries (view lifecycle, button actions)
// Parallel fetching
async let user = fetchUser(id)
async let posts = fetchPosts(userId: id)
let (userData, postsData) = try await (user, posts)
NavigationStack
NavigationStack(path: $router.path) {
ContentView()
.navigationDestination(for: Route.self) { route in
switch route {
case .detail(let id): DetailView(id: id)
case .settings: SettingsView()
}
}
}
Error Handling
- Use typed
throwswhere possible - Define domain-specific error enums conforming to
LocalizedError - Never force-unwrap (
!) outside of tests
AI Gotchas
- Sendable: Mark types shared across concurrency domains as
Sendable - MainActor: UI updates must happen on
@MainActor - Observation:
@ObservablereplacesObservableObjectin Swift 5.9+ - SwiftUI previews: Use
#Previewmacro instead ofPreviewProvider
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 75 lines · 45 tokens per session scan A a412803e942f
trove-swift is a skill published in the GitHub repository bravew/trove (10 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 45 tokens to every session and 492 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
wear-compose-m3
Expert guidance for working with Wear OS Compose Material3. Use this skill when creating, updating, or migrating Wear OS projects. This includes the androidx.wear.compose.material3, androidx.wear.compose.foundation, and androidx.wear.compose.navigation3 libraries. Also working with core components such as AppScaffold…
kotlin-specialist
Provides idiomatic Kotlin implementation patterns including coroutine concurrency, Flow stream handling, multiplatform architecture, Compose UI construction, Ktor server setup, and type-safe DSL design. Use when building Kotlin applications requiring coroutines, multiplatform development, or Android with Compose.…
build-android-binary
Compile a PAM control's Android Kotlin module into the runtime-loadable DEX for a .ppmplugin. Creates a staged Gradle build with the pinned wrapper and react-android compile dependency, verifies manifest/module/package alignment and runtime-loading constraints, builds the release AAR, then runs d8 --min-api 24. Writes…
swiftui-dev
Use this skill for SwiftUI development, architecture, structure, performance, and Apple native app profiling. It combines.
android-navigation-3
Install and migrate to Jetpack Navigation 3. Use when implementing Navigation 3 patterns including NavDisplay, NavKey routes, deep links, multiple backstacks, scenes (dialogs, bottom sheets), or migrating from Navigation 2.
mobiai-kmp
Use when working on a Kotlin Multiplatform project — shared code, expect/actual declarations, platform-specific implementations, building and testing.