pm-orchestration

pm-orchestration is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from BreadchainCoop/labor.fun. It costs 60 tokens per session (1,177 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A weekly project-management routine built on GitHub. It reviews task status, estimates, deadlines, ownership, and blockers, then coordinates the people involved.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it for weekly or on-demand reviews of GitHub work: re-estimating tasks, changing plans, assigning owners, updating deadlines or status, and messaging people on the critical path.
Why use it?
It helps teams respond when plans no longer match reality, such as when work is blocked, overdue, unassigned, or likely to miss its deadline. It also keeps affected owners informed about changes.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it for weekly or on-demand reviews of GitHub work: re-estimating tasks, changing plans, assigning owners, updating deadlines or status, and messaging people on the critical path.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/breadchaincoop/labor.fun/pm-orchestration
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add BreadchainCoop/labor.fun --skill pm-orchestration
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/BreadchainCoop/labor.fun

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for pm-orchestration

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/breadchaincoop/labor.fun/pm-orchestration/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/breadchaincoop/labor.fun/pm-orchestration)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/breadchaincoop/labor.fun/pm-orchestration"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/breadchaincoop/labor.fun/pm-orchestration/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for pm-orchestration

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/breadchaincoop/labor.fun/pm-orchestration"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/breadchaincoop/labor.fun/pm-orchestration.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 60 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,177 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00060 $0.01177
Opus 5.5 $0.00024 $0.00471
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00012 $0.00235
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00118

Measured 1mo ago against content hash e05bd68d319f, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

pm-orchestration scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

container/skills/pm-orchestration/SKILL.md · 96 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 96 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

/pm-orchestration — Continuous PM on top of GitHub

You run with a deterministic PM brief in your prompt (blocked / blocking / overdue / due-soon / per-owner load, an "Unassigned — needs an owner" list, a "DM these people" list, and a "do NOT re-ping" list). You're invoked two ways: on a schedule (weekly) and on demand from chat when someone says "run pm orchestration" / "/pm". Either way the brief is the same — do the routine on top of GitHub (re-evaluate, re-plan, communicate), don't reinvent tracking.

Philosophy: act first, then ask

Optimistically make the update, then ask the human to confirm. Do NOT ask permission first. When the brief (or your reading of the task) shows reality has diverged:

  • Re-estimate / adjust directly — update the task's estimate, deadline, or status via modify_kb_file, and/or comment + adjust the GitHub issue via mcp__github__*.
  • Then DM the affected owner stating what you changed and why, and invite them to reply if they want it adjusted. Example: "I bumped TASK-123's estimate from 2→5 pts and pushed the due date to Fri because it's blocked on the design asset — reply if that's wrong."

Make the smallest correct change. Never silently delete work or reassign owners without saying so in the DM.

Optimistic ≠ unverified. After every GitHub write (label, assignment, status, comment), confirm the tool call actually succeeded — read the issue back and check the change landed — before you tell anyone it's done. A chat/DM confirmation with no successful underlying tool call is a silent no-op (issue #93). For labels specifically: create the label first if the repo doesn't have it, apply per issue, verify by read-back, and report which issues changed and which failed. Full protocol: /workspace/project/rules/integrations/github.md ("Applying labels, tags & batch edits").

Who to DM (and who not to)

Use the brief's "DM these people" list as the ground truth for who:

  • Blocking owners — their incomplete task is on someone else's critical path. DM them: the task, who/what is waiting (the blocks: ids), why it matters now, and one clear ask (finish / re-estimate / hand off).
  • Overdue owners — DM: the task, how overdue, and "can you (a) finish, (b) re-estimate, or (c) hand it off?"

Read the full file on GitHub · 96 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 96 lines · 60 tokens per session scan A e05bd68d319f

Subscribe to this mod's changes

pm-orchestration is a skill published in the GitHub repository BreadchainCoop/labor.fun (2 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 60 tokens to every session and 1,177 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories