Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to Bredrumb/TomoriBot. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Bredrumb/TomoriBot/main/.agents/skills/adversarial-review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Bredrumb/TomoriBotWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/bredrumb/tomoribot/adversarial-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bredrumb/tomoribot/adversarial-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bredrumb/tomoribot/adversarial-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bredrumb/tomoribot/adversarial-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bredrumb/tomoribot/adversarial-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00072 | $0.02150 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00029 | $0.00860 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00430 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00215 |
Grade A, and why
adversarial-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 24d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed AGPL-3.0
The repository is licensed AGPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 24d ago Changed · +2 lines 40a99e50f897
- 1mo ago First seen · 260 lines · 72 tokens per session scan A f8e8700a6fae
adversarial-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository Bredrumb/TomoriBot (60 stars, last pushed today), licensed AGPL-3.0. It adds 72 tokens to every session and 2,150 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-27.
Other skills, from other repositories
control-center-review
Review one captured Control Center build before runtime activation.
review-pr
Review GitHub pull requests. Use when user says "review PR", "review pull request", or "/review-pr".
spawn-reviewers
Spawn and collect the reviewer fleet at stage20spawnreviewers. Consumes spawn.json.spec (the authoritative spawn spec from derive-spawn-spec / derive-static-spec), resolves CODEINTELALLOWED and CODEINTELREQUIREROOTARG, builds per-agent prompts from the per-agent template + role suffixes (Bug Hunter A/B, Unified…
workflow-code-review
Run a worker-backed code review using its bundled review lenses: approach correctness, architecture ownership, correctness, guardrails, validation, compatibility, and security. Use when asked to review a PR, branch, diff, or uncommitted changes with workflow-level rigor.
present-local
Render the operator-facing local-mode code review results at stage29present. Covers BLOCKING/HIGH/MEDIUM section templates, Justified Findings (PLN-721), Dismissed Findings (PLN-722), Verifier Stats footer (PLN-773), operator-flag descriptions, override precedence rule for stage22b, Validation Summary, and final…
review-this-branch
Run the nohuman review gate (fresh-session adversarial reviewer + tamper guard) over the current branch or a GitHub pull request, with no server, no database, and no onboarding, and relay the pass/fail checklist.