Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/bricerising/enterprise-software-playbook/platformnpx skills add bricerising/enterprise-software-playbook --skill platformgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bricerising/enterprise-software-playbookWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/bricerising/enterprise-software-playbook/platform)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bricerising/enterprise-software-playbook/platform"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bricerising/enterprise-software-playbook/platform.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00088 | $0.01722 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00044 | $0.00861 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00344 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00172 |
Grade A, and why
platform scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 130 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Platform (Shared Platform Library)
Overview
Create a small, disciplined “shared kernel” that drives cohesion across services by providing stable primitives at boundaries (auth, RPC, config, telemetry, resilience, lifecycles).
The goal is not reuse-for-reuse’s-sake; it’s consistent behavior and lower cognitive load across a system.
Inputs / Outputs
Inputs: Repeated boundary patterns identified across 2+ services; existing shared packages (if any).
Outputs: Shared package with stable API surface, adoption maturity tracks (V0/V1/V2), migration guidance. Consumed by spec (contract documentation), testing (seam tests), finish (adoption verification).
Workflow
- Define the objective function:
- what this extraction optimizes (for example: reliability, cognitive load, release speed)
- constraints and anti-goals
- Define the “platform surface” (what belongs here vs per-service).
- Inventory repetition across services and pick 1–2 extractions with the highest leverage.
- Design the module boundaries and dependency direction (avoid cycles, keep exports stable).
- Design APIs that are:
- explicit about inputs/outputs and expected failures (
Result/ tagged errors) - explicit about lifetimes (create/start/stop/dispose)
- explicit about cancellation/time budgets (
AbortSignal, deadlines) - explicit about telemetry fields (trace/log/metrics correlation)
- explicit about inputs/outputs and expected failures (
- Define adoption maturity tracks with entry criteria:
- V0 (minimum viable): almost impossible to fail; one golden path; minimal config
- V1 (standard): default for most services; stronger contracts and verification
- V2 (advanced): optional optimizations for high-scale/high-complexity cases
- Implement minimal primitives + one “golden path” usage in at least two services.
- Add tests at the seam (unit tests for primitives + characterization tests for adopters if needed).
- Document usage, deprecation/migration guidance, and reversal triggers.
Minimum viable execution
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 130 lines · 88 tokens per session scan A 4e6a6a455a46
platform is a skill published in the GitHub repository bricerising/enterprise-software-playbook (7 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 88 tokens to every session and 1,722 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
replit-deck
For product and technical management work: turn PRDs, roadmaps, RFCs, architecture reviews, and retros into decision documents. Built around the core query "pm-feature-business-case-deck", with product strategy lead judgment, buyer-ready proof, and this outcome: approve the feature, architecture, roadmap, or incident…
hps-true-blueprint
OpenDesign's engineering blueprint: how the sandbox, sidecar, and daemon fit — the system diagram and the invariants. Built as a decision-grade product management deck for engineering org.
html-ppt-knowledge-arch-blueprint
OpenDesign's incident retro: the daemon-restart data bug, the root cause, the fix, and the systemic follow-ups. Built as a decision-grade product management deck for engineering, SRE, leadership.
deck-open-slide-canvas
OpenDesign's architecture review: the local daemon + agent-runtime design, the tradeoffs, and the decision to lock. Built as a decision-grade product management deck for staff eng, tech leads, security.
architecture-aware-init
Selects architecture paradigm via research before scaffolding. Use when architecture is undecided and the choice needs justification and documentation.
frontmcp-guides
Tutorials, end-to-end walkthroughs, and complete reference projects for FrontMCP. Use when you want a getting-started guide, a full worked example, or to learn best practices by following a step-by-step build rather than a single API reference. Includes a beginner weather-API server (tool plus static resource, Zod…