Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to brifl/coding-agent-orchestration. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/brifl/coding-agent-orchestration/main/.codex/skills/continuous-refactor/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brifl/coding-agent-orchestrationWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/brifl/coding-agent-orchestration/continuous-refactor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/brifl/coding-agent-orchestration/continuous-refactor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/brifl/coding-agent-orchestration/continuous-refactor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/brifl/coding-agent-orchestration/continuous-refactor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/brifl/coding-agent-orchestration/continuous-refactor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00016 | $0.01031 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00412 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00206 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00103 |
Grade A, and why
continuous-refactor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 119 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
continuous-refactor
Purpose
Run the continuous-refactor workflow in continuous mode until the dispatcher
returns recommended_role: stop (only [MINOR] refactoring ideas remain).
The workflow rotates through three prompt steps in a strict cycle:
prompt.refactor_scan— identify code smells and refactoring candidatesprompt.refactor_execute— apply selected refactoringsprompt.refactor_verify— verify refactored code correctness
Cold starts are handled automatically — the infrastructure initialises the rotation at step 1 when no prior runtime entry exists.
Agent execution protocol
Run one dispatcher step at a time:
# 1. Ask the dispatcher for the next prompt
python3 .codex/skills/vibe-loop/scripts/agentctl.py --repo-root . --format json next --workflow continuous-refactor
# 2. Read the prompt body from the catalog path returned by the dispatcher
python3 .codex/skills/vibe-prompts/scripts/prompt_catalog.py <prompt_catalog_path> get <recommended_prompt_id>
# 3. Execute the prompt body (do the actual refactoring work)
# 4. After execution, record the loop result
python3 .codex/skills/vibe-loop/scripts/agentctl.py --repo-root . --format json loop-result --line "LOOP_RESULT: <json>"
# 5. Repeat from step 1 until recommended_role == "stop"
The --workflow continuous-refactor flag is required — it activates the
continuous override that ignores normal plan-state routing and selects from the
refactor prompt rotation instead.
In this orchestration source repo, use tools/agentctl.py and tools/prompt_catalog.py
instead; the .codex runtime helper scripts are generated during install.
LOOP_RESULT format
After executing each prompt, emit a LOOP_RESULT JSON line with the dispatcher-required report fields:
{
"loop": "implement",
"result": "ready_for_review",
"stage": "<current_stage>",
"checkpoint": "<current_checkpoint>",
"status": "<current_status>",
"next_role_hint": "implement|review|stop",
"workflow": "continuous-refactor",
"report": {
"acceptance_matrix": [
{
"item": "<checked behavior>",
"status": "PASS|FAIL|N/A",
"evidence": "<command or file evidence>",
"critical": true,
"confidence": 0.9,
"evidence_strength": "LOW|MEDIUM|HIGH"
}
],
"top_findings": [
{"impact": "MAJOR|MINOR", "title": "[MAJOR|MODERATE|MINOR] ...", "evidence": "...", "action": "..."}
],
"state_transition": {
"before": {"stage": "<current_stage>", "checkpoint": "<current_checkpoint>", "status": "<previous_status>"},
"after": {"stage": "<current_stage>", "checkpoint": "<current_checkpoint>", "status": "<current_status>"}
},
"loop_result": {
"loop": "implement",
"result": "ready_for_review",
"stage": "<current_stage>",
"checkpoint": "<current_checkpoint>",
"status": "<current_status>",
"next_role_hint": "implement|review|stop"
}
}
}
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 119 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A 9c220f8d33d8
continuous-refactor is a skill published in the GitHub repository brifl/coding-agent-orchestration (22 stars, last pushed 15d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 1,031 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.
omh-code-review
This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
explore-unknowns
Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…
re0-merge
Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…
asplos-writing-style
Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and…