saas-agreement

saas-agreement is a skill for Claude Code from bromso/metapowers. It costs 77 tokens per session (1,092 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A software-as-a-service agreement is a customer contract for using software over the internet. It sets terms for subscriptions, billing, service levels, data, security, suspension, exports, and liability.

In plain words
What is it for?
It helps draft agreements covering the licence or subscription, billing, service-level commitments, data ownership, security duties, service suspension, data export, and liability limits.
Why use it?
It gives software providers a consistent set of terms for business customers and clarifies each side's responsibilities. This reduces uncertainty about payment, outages, data handling, and ending the service.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: argument-hint in frontmatter.

Runs only inside its plugin — its command needs a path that Claude Code sets for a plugin’s own hooks and for nothing else. Install the plugin, not this.

Part of the legal plugin — 35 skills shipped together

Good fit It helps draft agreements covering the licence or subscription, billing, service-level commitments, data ownership, security duties, service suspension, data export, and liability limits.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install

Getting it into your agent

This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.

Claude Code
/plugin marketplace add bromso/metapowers
Claude Code
/plugin install legal

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install legal, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 35 skills.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for saas-agreement

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bromso/metapowers/saas-agreement/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/bromso/metapowers/saas-agreement)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bromso/metapowers/saas-agreement"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bromso/metapowers/saas-agreement/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for saas-agreement

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bromso/metapowers/saas-agreement"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bromso/metapowers/saas-agreement.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 77 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,092 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00077 $0.01092
Opus 5.5 $0.00031 $0.00437
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00015 $0.00218
Haiku 4.5 $0.00008 $0.00109

Measured 3d ago against content hash f9398d9f98c7, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

saas-agreement scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/legal/skills/saas-agreement/SKILL.md · 61 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 61 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

SaaS Agreement

Draft a SaaS subscription or licensing agreement for "$ARGUMENTS". Generate a comprehensive agreement covering subscription terms, service levels, data handling, and liability.

Note: AI-generated legal content does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified attorney.

Arguments. $ARGUMENTS may contain the project name and optional flags. Take the first token as <project> and treat --skip-checks as a flag; never include flags in file paths. All paths below use <project>. If --skip-checks is present, skip the prerequisite check and, before writing any artifact, append one line to .metapowers/legal/<project>/skip-log.md: - <ISO timestamp> — <skill name> skipped prerequisite check for <artifact file> — reason: <reason or "none given">.

Prerequisites

Check that .metapowers/legal/<project>/00-assess.md exists. If it does not exist, stop and tell the user:

"Run an Assess skill first (e.g. /legal:risk-assessment <project>) to generate the prerequisite assessment artifact."

Process

  1. Read inputs:

    • Read .metapowers/legal/<project>/00-assess.md for risk and jurisdiction context
    • Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/shared/contract-template.md for standard contract provisions
  2. Identify service context:

    • Nature of the SaaS product and core functionality
    • Target customers (B2B, B2C, or both)
    • Pricing model (per-seat, usage-based, tiered, flat-rate)
    • Deployment model (multi-tenant, single-tenant, hybrid)
    • Data sensitivity level and regulatory requirements
  3. Draft the following sections:

    • License Grant — scope of access rights (non-exclusive, non-transferable, subscription-based), permitted users, restrictions (no sublicensing, no reverse engineering, no competitive use)
    • Subscription Terms — plan descriptions, billing cycle (monthly/annual), auto-renewal terms, upgrade/downgrade procedures, free trial terms (if applicable)
    • SLA and Uptime Commitments — uptime target (e.g., 99.9%), measurement methodology, scheduled maintenance windows, service credits for downtime, exclusions from SLA
    • Data Ownership and Processing — customer retains ownership of customer data, provider's limited license to process, data processing agreement reference (GDPR Article 28), data location and transfer restrictions
    • Security Obligations — provider security standards (SOC 2, ISO 27001, encryption at rest and in transit), breach notification timelines and procedures, security audit rights
    • Acceptable Use Policy — prohibited uses, resource limits, abuse handling, account suspension triggers
    • Support and Maintenance — support tiers and response times, included vs. paid support, maintenance windows and update policy, end-of-life and deprecation notice periods
    • Payment Terms — fees and payment schedule, invoicing procedures, late payment consequences (interest, suspension), price change notice requirements, taxes and withholding
    • Suspension Rights — grounds for suspension (non-payment, AUP violation, security threat), notice requirements, data preservation during suspension, reinstatement procedures
    • Termination and Data Export/Deletion — termination for cause and convenience, notice periods, data export period post-termination (typically 30-90 days), data deletion certification, survival clauses
    • Limitation of Liability — aggregate liability cap (typically 12 months of fees), exclusion of consequential damages, carve-outs (IP indemnification, confidentiality breach, willful misconduct)
    • IP Ownership and Feedback — provider owns all IP in the service, customer feedback license (if customer suggestions are incorporated), no implied IP rights
    • Compliance with Laws — each party's obligation to comply with applicable laws, specific regulatory compliance commitments (GDPR, HIPAA, SOX as applicable)
    • Governing Law — choice of law, dispute resolution mechanism, venue selection

Read the full file on GitHub · 61 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 3d ago First seen · 61 lines · 77 tokens per session scan A f9398d9f98c7

Subscribe to this mod's changes

saas-agreement is a skill published in the GitHub repository bromso/metapowers (2 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 77 tokens to every session and 1,092 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-21.