Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to brovar/10x-pentest. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/brovar/10x-pentest/main/.github/skills/pt-code-scan/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brovar/10x-pentestWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/brovar/10x-pentest/pt-code-scan)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/brovar/10x-pentest/pt-code-scan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/brovar/10x-pentest/pt-code-scan/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/brovar/10x-pentest/pt-code-scan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/brovar/10x-pentest/pt-code-scan.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00104 | $0.01443 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00042 | $0.00577 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00289 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00144 |
Grade A, and why
pt-code-scan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 102 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/pt-code-scan — Agentic Code Scanning (Stage 3)
Execute the analysis passes (CA-NNN) from code/code-plan.md as an AI agent — read each pass's
targets, apply its technique + methodology, and reason about whether the pass's positive is present.
This is agent-first and not tool-dependent: it runs with zero external scanners. Where a tool is
available and adds value over pure reasoning (a SAST engine for breadth on a large repo, a dependency
scanner for fresh CVE data, a secret scanner for entropy sweeps), the agent may run it and fold its
output in as additional candidate signal. Output is normalized into candidate findings — raw
signal for /pt-code-review to triage, never findings on their own.
When to use, when to skip
- Use to execute the planned passes into candidates before the confirmation pass.
- Skip the whole code stage if black-box (
repo_access: false) →/pt-dynamic-plan. Skip an individual tool that adds nothing over the agent — tools are optional, not required.
Initial Response
- With
<engagement-id>: proceed to Step 0. - Without: print
Usage: /pt-code-scan <engagement-id>.and STOP.
Inputs
code/code-plan.md— [blocking] (theCA-NNNpasses to execute).- Source repositories — [blocking].
scope.md— [blocking] (readiness ≠ blocked;repo_access: true).- Available tools — [optional] — used only on a pass where they add value over the agent.
- Human-provided SBOM / advisory feed — [optional] — freshens
dep-auditCVE coverage (hybrid SCA).
Process
Step 0: Validate + resume
Validate scope (repo_access: true, else STOP → /pt-dynamic-plan) and that code/code-plan.md
exists. Act only on planned passes; a re-run appends a new dated result under
code/scan-results/, never overwriting a prior one; leave scanned/reviewed passes alone.
Step 1: Execute each pass (agent-first)
For each planned CA-NNN: read its targets (R-NNN/path), apply the technique +
methodology_refs, and reason for the pass's positive. Optional tools: where a tool is available
and value-adding for this pass, run it over the repo (never the live target) and treat its output
as extra candidate signal — dedup against the agent's own reasoning. For dep-audit, reason over
lockfiles; if a human SBOM/advisory feed is present, use it for CVE freshness (pure agentic dep-audit
is bounded by knowledge cutoff — say so honestly).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 102 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 761d1b656058
pt-code-scan is a skill published in the GitHub repository brovar/10x-pentest (3 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 104 tokens to every session and 1,443 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
insight-error-page
Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…