Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/brunob54/superpowers-orchestrator/requesting-code-reviewnpx skills add brunob54/superpowers-orchestrator --skill requesting-code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brunob54/superpowers-orchestratorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/brunob54/superpowers-orchestrator/requesting-code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/brunob54/superpowers-orchestrator/requesting-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/brunob54/superpowers-orchestrator/requesting-code-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00083 | $0.01295 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00042 | $0.00647 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00259 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00129 |
Grade A, and why
requesting-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 112 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Requesting Code Review
Request review early to catch issues before they spread.
When
- After completing a plan task or batch
- After major refactor/feature work
- Before merge or PR finalization
How
- Determine review range (
BASE_SHA->HEAD_SHA). - Check for
context-snapshot.jsonat the project root:- If present: run
git rev-parse HEADand compare togit_hashin the file.- Hashes match (fresh): use
changed_filesandblast_radiusas the review scope. Inject this summary into the code-reviewer prompt: "Changed files: [list]. Also referenced by: [blast_radius callers]." - Hashes differ (stale): note the snapshot is from a previous commit; use
changed_filesas a starting point but do not rely onblast_radius.
- Hashes match (fresh): use
- If absent: determine scope from
git diff --name-only BASE_SHA..HEAD_SHAdirectly.
- If present: run
- Dispatch
superpowers-orchestrator:code-reviewerusingrequesting-code-review/code-reviewer.md. - Provide:
- What changed (from context snapshot or git diff)
- Scoped file list (changed files + blast radius callers if fresh snapshot available, or broad if not)
- Requirement or plan reference
- SHA range
- Short summary
Security Review (Built-In)
When changes touch security-relevant areas, the code review must include a security pass. This is not a separate step — it's part of every review where applicable.
Triggers automatically when changes touch:
- Authentication or authorization flows
- Input validation or output encoding
- API endpoints handling user data
- Secrets management or credential handling
- Cryptography, key management, or token generation
- Infrastructure, deployment, or CI/CD configs
Security checklist:
- OWASP Top 10 and CWE vulnerability scan
- OWASP API Security Top 10: broken object/function-level authorization, unrestricted resource consumption, SSRF, mass assignment, improper inventory management
- Input validation and injection risk (SQL, XSS, CSRF, command injection)
- Auth flow correctness (session handling, token expiry, privilege escalation, rate limiting on auth endpoints)
- Secrets handling (no hardcoded credentials, proper env var usage)
- Dependency vulnerabilities (known CVEs in imported packages)
- API hardening (security headers, CORS configuration, error message sanitization, rate limiting)
- Logging hygiene (no secrets in logs, adequate audit trail)
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 112 lines · 83 tokens per session scan A e1986478fcdb
requesting-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository brunob54/superpowers-orchestrator (3 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 83 tokens to every session and 1,295 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
github-pr-review
Handles PR review comments and feedback resolution. Use when user wants to resolve PR comments, handle review feedback, fix review comments, address PR review, check review status, respond to reviewer, verify PR readiness, review PR comments, analyze review feedback, evaluate PR comments, assess review suggestions, or…
privacy-guard
Prevents private infrastructure details (node hostnames, internal project names, local usernames and personal emails, absolute home paths, private and VPN IP ranges) from leaking into public repositories through commits, PRs, docs or release artifacts. Use when working in a public or soon-to-be-public repo, before…
github-pr-creation
Creates GitHub Pull Requests with automated validation and task tracking. Use when user wants to create PR, open pull request, submit for review, or check if ready for PR. Analyzes commits, validates task completion, generates Conventional Commits title and description, suggests labels. NOTE - for merging existing…
github-pr-merge
Merges GitHub Pull Requests after validating pre-merge checklist. Use when user wants to merge PR, close PR, finalize PR, complete merge, approve and merge, or execute merge. Runs pre-merge validation (tests, lint, CI, comments), confirms with user, merges with proper format, handles post-merge cleanup.
git-commit
Creates git commits following Conventional Commits format with type/scope/subject. Use when user wants to commit changes, create commit, save work, or stage and commit. Enforces project-specific conventions from CLAUDE.md.
merger
Multi-issue integration and merge skill - handles post-QA integration of completed worktrees.