claude-flet-plugin: Skill for Claude Code

.agents/skills/flet-review-workflow/SKILL.md

flet-review-workflow is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from brunobrown/claude-flet-plugin. It costs 25 tokens per session (1,539 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A checklist for reviewing Flet applications and extensions. Flet is a Python framework for building user interfaces and custom interface components.

In plain words
What is it for?
It is for checking Flet apps, Flet extensions, or projects containing both against the relevant code-quality checklist.
Why use it?
It helps reviewers catch common problems in rendering, state management, entry points, and component structure that can make a Flet project behave incorrectly.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for Claude Code and Codex: shipped in a Claude Code plugin, but also agents/openai.yaml present. Also seen: installed under .agents/ (shared by several agents).

This is brunobrown/claude-flet-plugin's own configuration. It tells Claude Code and Codex how to work on claude-flet-plugin itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything claude-flet-plugin configures →

Part of the flet plugin — 6 skills, 3 commands, 2 agents shipped together

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to brunobrown/claude-flet-plugin. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/brunobrown/claude-flet-plugin/main/.agents/skills/flet-review-workflow/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brunobrown/claude-flet-plugin

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Or install flet, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 6 skills, 3 commands, 2 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for flet-review-workflow

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/brunobrown/claude-flet-plugin/flet-review-workflow/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/brunobrown/claude-flet-plugin/flet-review-workflow)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/brunobrown/claude-flet-plugin/flet-review-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/brunobrown/claude-flet-plugin/flet-review-workflow/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for flet-review-workflow

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/brunobrown/claude-flet-plugin/flet-review-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/brunobrown/claude-flet-plugin/flet-review-workflow.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 25 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,539 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00025 $0.01539
Opus 5 $0.00013 $0.00770
Sonnet 5 $0.00005 $0.00308
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00154

Measured 12d ago against content hash 3e985c6dc57e, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

flet-review-workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.agents/skills/flet-review-workflow/SKILL.md · 131 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 131 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Flet Review Workflow

You are performing a comprehensive code review of Flet code. First, determine whether the code is a Flet app or a Flet extension, then apply the appropriate checklist.


Step 1: Identify Code Type

Scan the codebase to determine:

  • App: Contains ft.run(main), @ft.component, page.render_views()
  • Extension: Contains @ft.control("Name"), ft.Service or ft.LayoutControl
  • Both: App that uses a custom extension

Step 2: App Checklist

If reviewing a Flet app, check all of these:

Entry Point & Rendering

  • Uses ft.run(main) — NOT ft.app()
  • Uses page.render_views() or page.render() — NOT page.add()
  • Does NOT call page.update() manually (declarative mode handles this)
  • page.render(Component) passes reference, NOT page.render(Component())

State Management

  • @ft.observable comes BEFORE @dataclass (order matters)
  • ft.use_state() used for local form fields (not @ft.observable)
  • Observable lists use .append() / .clear() to trigger re-renders
  • State created outside components in main() when handlers need access
  • No direct mutation of observable list elements (items[0] = x)

Hooks

  • All hooks called inside @ft.component only (never in regular functions)
  • Hooks NOT inside conditionals or loops (fixed order required)
  • use_effect cleanup uses cleanup= parameter (NOT return value)
  • use_effect dependencies array is correct ([] for mount-only)
  • use_ref used for mutable refs that shouldn't trigger re-renders

Components

  • All components use @ft.component decorator
  • Context accessed via ft.use_context(AppCtx) (not passing page as prop)
  • Factory functions used in loops to avoid closure traps
  • Async handlers use try/except for error handling

Navigation

  • view_ref[0].show_drawer() used (NOT page.show_drawer())
  • PAGE_BUILDERS dict maps page IDs to component functions
  • Router clears page.views before adding new views
  • on_view_pop handler implemented for router-based navigation

Read the full file on GitHub · 131 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 131 lines · 25 tokens per session scan A 3e985c6dc57e

Subscribe to this mod's changes

flet-review-workflow is a skill published in the GitHub repository brunobrown/claude-flet-plugin (3 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 1,539 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

qt-qml-review

Invoke when the user asks to review, check, audit, or look over Qt6 QML code -- or suggest before committing. Runs deterministic linting (47+ rules) then six parallel deep- analysis agents covering bindings, layout, loaders, delegates, states, and performance. Optionally invokes system qmllint for type-level checks.…

mavlink/qgroundcontrol · 95 tokens

verify-behavior

Verify or reproduce visible product behavior by driving the real UI with pi-computer-use's checked tools, requiring verified expect postconditions and durable state evidence for meaningful UI flows. Use when triage needs visual reproduction, implementation needs behavioral proof, review needs interactive confirmation…

nicknisi/dotfiles · 68 tokens

recipe-front-review

Reviews completed frontend implementation for governing-source compliance, scope economy, repository quality, and security, then applies user-approved React corrections.

shinpr/claude-code-workflows · 29 tokens

qa-frontend

Internal PostHog developer frontend/browser QA skill. Use only when a PostHog developer explicitly asks to run frontend QA, browser-test a PR, verify a UI flow against the local PostHog stack, use qa-frontend, or QA current frontend changes with browser/runtime evidence. Do not use for generic code review, PR review…

PostHog/posthog · 142 tokens

frontend-architecture

Frontend component architecture review — dispatch the component-architecture-review agent over the frontend component files to catch reusable components that should be extracted, duplicated UI patterns, prop drilling, component-granularity problems, and inconsistent component APIs as a frontend evolves. Use when the…

bdfinst/agentic-dev-team · 106 tokens

review-persistence-security-resources

Normative reviewer for persistence, settings, secrets, logging hygiene, resources, caches, cross-platform behavior and long-lived state in the explyt/spring-plugin IntelliJ plugin. Use when reviewing changes that touch PersistentStateComponent, settings UI, credentials, caches, service fields, logging, file paths…

explyt/spring-plugin · 83 tokens