Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to brunobrown/claude-flet-plugin. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/brunobrown/claude-flet-plugin/main/.agents/skills/flet-review-workflow/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brunobrown/claude-flet-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/brunobrown/claude-flet-plugin/flet-review-workflow)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/brunobrown/claude-flet-plugin/flet-review-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/brunobrown/claude-flet-plugin/flet-review-workflow/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/brunobrown/claude-flet-plugin/flet-review-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/brunobrown/claude-flet-plugin/flet-review-workflow.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00025 | $0.01539 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00770 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00308 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00154 |
Grade A, and why
flet-review-workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 131 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Flet Review Workflow
You are performing a comprehensive code review of Flet code. First, determine whether the code is a Flet app or a Flet extension, then apply the appropriate checklist.
Step 1: Identify Code Type
Scan the codebase to determine:
- App: Contains
ft.run(main),@ft.component,page.render_views() - Extension: Contains
@ft.control("Name"),ft.Serviceorft.LayoutControl - Both: App that uses a custom extension
Step 2: App Checklist
If reviewing a Flet app, check all of these:
Entry Point & Rendering
- Uses
ft.run(main)— NOTft.app() - Uses
page.render_views()orpage.render()— NOTpage.add() - Does NOT call
page.update()manually (declarative mode handles this) -
page.render(Component)passes reference, NOTpage.render(Component())
State Management
-
@ft.observablecomes BEFORE@dataclass(order matters) -
ft.use_state()used for local form fields (not@ft.observable) - Observable lists use
.append()/.clear()to trigger re-renders - State created outside components in
main()when handlers need access - No direct mutation of observable list elements (
items[0] = x)
Hooks
- All hooks called inside
@ft.componentonly (never in regular functions) - Hooks NOT inside conditionals or loops (fixed order required)
-
use_effectcleanup usescleanup=parameter (NOT return value) -
use_effectdependencies array is correct ([] for mount-only) -
use_refused for mutable refs that shouldn't trigger re-renders
Components
- All components use
@ft.componentdecorator - Context accessed via
ft.use_context(AppCtx)(not passingpageas prop) - Factory functions used in loops to avoid closure traps
- Async handlers use try/except for error handling
Navigation
-
view_ref[0].show_drawer()used (NOTpage.show_drawer()) - PAGE_BUILDERS dict maps page IDs to component functions
- Router clears
page.viewsbefore adding new views -
on_view_pophandler implemented for router-based navigation
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 131 lines · 25 tokens per session scan A 3e985c6dc57e
flet-review-workflow is a skill published in the GitHub repository brunobrown/claude-flet-plugin (3 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 1,539 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
qt-qml-review
Invoke when the user asks to review, check, audit, or look over Qt6 QML code -- or suggest before committing. Runs deterministic linting (47+ rules) then six parallel deep- analysis agents covering bindings, layout, loaders, delegates, states, and performance. Optionally invokes system qmllint for type-level checks.…
verify-behavior
Verify or reproduce visible product behavior by driving the real UI with pi-computer-use's checked tools, requiring verified expect postconditions and durable state evidence for meaningful UI flows. Use when triage needs visual reproduction, implementation needs behavioral proof, review needs interactive confirmation…
recipe-front-review
Reviews completed frontend implementation for governing-source compliance, scope economy, repository quality, and security, then applies user-approved React corrections.
qa-frontend
Internal PostHog developer frontend/browser QA skill. Use only when a PostHog developer explicitly asks to run frontend QA, browser-test a PR, verify a UI flow against the local PostHog stack, use qa-frontend, or QA current frontend changes with browser/runtime evidence. Do not use for generic code review, PR review…
frontend-architecture
Frontend component architecture review — dispatch the component-architecture-review agent over the frontend component files to catch reusable components that should be extracted, duplicated UI patterns, prop drilling, component-granularity problems, and inconsistent component APIs as a frontend evolves. Use when the…
review-persistence-security-resources
Normative reviewer for persistence, settings, secrets, logging hygiene, resources, caches, cross-platform behavior and long-lived state in the explyt/spring-plugin IntelliJ plugin. Use when reviewing changes that touch PersistentStateComponent, settings UI, credentials, caches, service fields, logging, file paths…