What is reviewer-code-review?

A code-review procedure for checking changed code, tests, security, architecture, and project rules. It ends with either APPROVED or CRITICAL.

Use it after finishing a task, before merging a major change, or when someone asks for a code review.

It provides a short, consistent decision about whether completed work is safe and ready to continue toward merging. It also catches failing tests and important design problems.

reviewer-code-review — Skill for Cursor by budagov-lab/DreamTeam

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent

npx skills add budagov-lab/DreamTeam --skill reviewer-code-review

Clone the repo

git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/budagov-lab/DreamTeam

Made for: Cursor.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

README.md

[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/budagov-lab/dreamteam/reviewer-code-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/budagov-lab/dreamteam/reviewer-code-review)

Your own site

<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/budagov-lab/dreamteam/reviewer-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/budagov-lab/dreamteam/reviewer-code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

Your own site · 80×15

<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/budagov-lab/dreamteam/reviewer-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/budagov-lab/dreamteam/reviewer-code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>

Per session 31 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.

When invoked 262 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.

Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.

Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.

Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

Model	Per session	Once invoked
Fable 5.1	$0.00031	$0.00262
Opus 5.5	$0.00012	$0.00105
Sonnet 5.5	$0.00006	$0.00052
Haiku 4.5	$0.00003	$0.00026

Measured 2mo ago against content hash d64a70ebc92f, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

reviewer-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.cursor/skills/reviewer-code-review/SKILL.md · 36 lines

What it actually says