bilge-development-kit: Skill for Claude Code

.claude/skills/audit/SKILL.md

audit is a skill for Claude Code from bugrabilge/bilge-development-kit. It costs 48 tokens per session (1,640 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A project-wide codebase audit covering architecture, dependencies, complexity, and technical debt—the accumulated cost of shortcuts or aging code. It includes focused checks for areas such as dependency risks and large or complex files.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it for architecture reviews, dependency checks, complexity analysis, technical-debt inventories, and overall code-quality checks.
Why use it?
It gives a broader view of a project's health than reviewing one file or pull request at a time.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: disable-model-invocation in frontmatter.

This is bugrabilge/bilge-development-kit's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on bilge-development-kit itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything bilge-development-kit configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to bugrabilge/bilge-development-kit. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/bugrabilge/bilge-development-kit/main/.claude/skills/audit/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bugrabilge/bilge-development-kit

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for audit

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bugrabilge/bilge-development-kit/audit/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/bugrabilge/bilge-development-kit/audit)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bugrabilge/bilge-development-kit/audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bugrabilge/bilge-development-kit/audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for audit

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bugrabilge/bilge-development-kit/audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bugrabilge/bilge-development-kit/audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 48 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,640 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00048 $0.01640
Opus 5.5 $0.00019 $0.00656
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00010 $0.00328
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00164

Measured 2mo ago against content hash 9559708d4d83, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/skills/audit/SKILL.md · 215 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 215 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

/audit - Codebase Audit

$ARGUMENTS


Purpose

Project-wide codebase health analysis. Unlike /review (file/PR focused), /audit examines the entire project: architecture patterns, dependency risks, complexity hotspots, and tech debt.


Sub-commands

/audit                - Full audit (all dimensions)
/audit architecture   - Architecture patterns and violations
/audit dependencies   - Dependency graph, outdated/vulnerable packages
/audit complexity     - Cyclomatic complexity hotspots
/audit tech-debt      - Tech debt inventory with effort estimates
/audit size           - File/module size analysis

Behavior

When /audit is triggered:

1. Project Discovery

Auto-collect project context using Read, Glob, and Grep tools:

  1. Tech stack: Read package.json, pyproject.toml, go.mod, Cargo.toml
  2. File count: Use Glob to count source files
  3. Lines of code: Use Bash with simple commands (no pipes)
  4. Recent commits: Use git log --oneline -10

2. Architecture Audit

Analyze project structure for:

Check What to Look For
Pattern consistency Is it feature-based, domain-driven, or flat? Are there violations?
Circular dependencies Import cycles between modules
Layer violations UI importing from DB layer, utils importing from features
Dead code Exported but never imported files/functions
Config sprawl Too many config files at root level
Entry point clarity Is the app's starting point obvious?

3. Dependency Audit

# Node.js
npm audit 2>/dev/null || true
npm outdated 2>/dev/null || true

# Python
pip audit 2>/dev/null || true
pip list --outdated 2>/dev/null || true

# General
cat package-lock.json 2>/dev/null | python3 -c "import json,sys; d=json.load(sys.stdin); print(f'Total deps: {len(d.get(\"packages\",{}))}')" 2>/dev/null || true

Check for:

  • Vulnerable packages — known CVEs
  • Outdated majors — 2+ major versions behind
  • Abandoned packages — no updates in 2+ years
  • Duplicate packages — same functionality, different libs
  • Bundle impact — largest dependencies by size

Read the full file on GitHub · 215 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2mo ago First seen · 215 lines · 48 tokens per session scan A 9559708d4d83

Subscribe to this mod's changes

audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository bugrabilge/bilge-development-kit (10 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 48 tokens to every session and 1,640 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

autoreview

Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.

openclaw/clawhub · 17 tokens

omh-code-review

This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).

rlaope/oh-my-hermes · 48 tokens

revdiff-plan

Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…

umputun/revdiff · 84 tokens

explore-unknowns

Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…

dzhng/skills · 162 tokens

re0-merge

Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…

LilMGenius/paperthin · 70 tokens

asplos-writing-style

Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and…

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills · 65 tokens