Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add build-with-dhiraj/ai-workflow-framework-portability-kit --skill design-taste-frontendgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/build-with-dhiraj/ai-workflow-framework-portability-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/build-with-dhiraj/ai-workflow-framework-portability-kit/design-taste-frontend)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/build-with-dhiraj/ai-workflow-framework-portability-kit/design-taste-frontend"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/build-with-dhiraj/ai-workflow-framework-portability-kit/design-taste-frontend/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/build-with-dhiraj/ai-workflow-framework-portability-kit/design-taste-frontend"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/build-with-dhiraj/ai-workflow-framework-portability-kit/design-taste-frontend.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00116 | $0.21967 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00046 | $0.08787 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00023 | $0.04393 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.02197 |
Grade A, and why
design-taste-frontend scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 25d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
98% identical to design-taste-frontend — 1,464 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 1,207 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
tasteskill: Anti-Slop Frontend Skill
Landing pages, portfolios, and redesigns. Not dashboards, not data tables, not multi-step product UI. Every rule below is contextual. None of it fires automatically. First read the brief, then pull only what fits.
0. BRIEF INFERENCE (Read the Room Before Anything Else)
Before touching code or tweaking dials, infer what the user actually wants. Most LLM design output is bad because the model jumps to a default aesthetic instead of reading the room.
0.A Read these signals first
- Page kind - landing (SaaS / consumer / agency / event), portfolio (dev / designer / creative studio), redesign (preserve vs overhaul), editorial / blog.
- Vibe words the user used - "minimalist", "calm", "Linear-style", "Awwwards", "brutalist", "premium consumer", "Apple-y", "playful", "serious B2B", "editorial", "agency-y", "glassy", "dark tech".
- Reference signals - URLs they linked, screenshots they pasted, products they named, brands they're competing with.
- Audience - B2B procurement panel vs. design-conscious consumer vs. recruiter scanning a portfolio. The audience picks the aesthetic, not your taste.
- Brand assets that already exist - logo, color, type, photography. For redesigns, these are starting material, not optional input (see Section 11).
- Quiet constraints - accessibility-first audiences, public-sector, regulated industries, trust-first commerce, kids' products. These constraints OVERRIDE aesthetic preference.
0.B Output a one-line "Design Read" before generating
Before any code, state in one line: "Reading this as: <page kind> for <audience>, with a <vibe> language, leaning toward <design system or aesthetic family>."
Example reads:
- "Reading this as: B2B SaaS landing for technical buyers, with a Linear-style minimalist language, leaning toward Tailwind utilities + Geist + restrained motion."
- "Reading this as: solo designer portfolio for hiring managers, with an editorial / kinetic-type language, leaning toward native CSS + scroll-driven animation + custom typography."
- "Reading this as: redesign of a public-sector service site, with a trust-first language, leaning toward GOV.UK Frontend or USWDS."
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 25d ago First seen · 1,207 lines · 116 tokens per session scan A 9a22c04846c7
design-taste-frontend is a skill published in the GitHub repository build-with-dhiraj/ai-workflow-framework-portability-kit (5 stars, last pushed 12d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 116 tokens to every session and 21,967 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 98% identical to design-taste-frontend, differing in 1,464 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
interaction-skill
Layer A interaction-mechanics reference anchored to the beui.dev catalog. Stacks on any style skill whenever work adds or changes motion or interaction — micro-interactions, animated components, transitions, gestures, hover/press/state feedback, loading/success/error morphs, 'make it feel alive'. Mandates reading the…
vertical-site-conventions
Compose pages and sites that read as their vertical: ecommerce-catalog storefronts that look like storefronts, hospitality-food sites that look like restaurants, b2b-manufacturer sites that look industrial. Use this skill whenever the user wants to build a site that looks like the vertical it serves, fix a build that…
gsap
Expert guidelines for building high-performance animations with GSAP (GreenSock Animation Platform).
suede-design
Suede AI design skill for making an interface feel intentional instead of templated: design tokens, color strategy, OKLCH ramps, type scale, fluid type, visual hierarchy, dark mode, spacing, component laws, motion, and source-to-implementation visual QA. Use when asked to design, restyle, polish, or audit a screen…
ui-design
Designs and builds React/Next/Tailwind UI, audits visual and interaction defects, and stress-tests components with worst-case data. Use when asked to "build a landing page", "extract our design system", "add dark mode", "make this responsive", "remove UI slop", "audit this component", "stress-test this component"…
agent-accessibility-expert
Specialist subagent: WCAG compliance, screen reader compatibility, and inclusive design patterns. Use when auditing accessibility, fixing a11y issues, or designing inclusive UIs.