Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add build-with-dhiraj/ai-workflow-framework-portability-kit --skill evaluating-agent-behaviorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/build-with-dhiraj/ai-workflow-framework-portability-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/build-with-dhiraj/ai-workflow-framework-portability-kit/evaluating-agent-behavior)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/build-with-dhiraj/ai-workflow-framework-portability-kit/evaluating-agent-behavior"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/build-with-dhiraj/ai-workflow-framework-portability-kit/evaluating-agent-behavior/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/build-with-dhiraj/ai-workflow-framework-portability-kit/evaluating-agent-behavior"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/build-with-dhiraj/ai-workflow-framework-portability-kit/evaluating-agent-behavior.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00028 | $0.00239 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00096 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00048 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00024 |
Grade A, and why
Evaluating Agent Behavior scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Evaluating Agent Behavior
Behavioral evaluations (evals) validate the agent's decision-making, such as tool choice and steerability.
Workflow Decision Tree
- Does it need validation?: If a prompt or tool change affects decision-making, it requires an eval.
- Choosing the Rig:
- appEvalTest (AppRig): For UI-heavy or complex interactive flows.
- evalTest (TestRig): For logic-focused behavior.
- Policy Setting:
- USUALLY_PASSES: For new tests.
- ALWAYS_PASSES: For established tests to lock in regressions.
Checklist
- Setup Workspace: Initialize the test environment.
- Write Assertions: Define the expected tool calls or behavioral markers.
- Verify: Run the eval suite and analyze failures.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 25 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A 6ee5766ab52a
Evaluating Agent Behavior is a skill published in the GitHub repository build-with-dhiraj/ai-workflow-framework-portability-kit (5 stars, last pushed 16d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 239 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-21.
Other skills, from other repositories
semgrep-rule-variant-creator
Creates language variants of existing Semgrep rules. Use when porting a Semgrep rule to specified target languages. Takes an existing rule and target languages as input, produces independent rule+test directories for each language.
openspec-verify-change
Verify implementation matches change artifacts. Use when the user wants to validate that implementation is complete, correct, and coherent before archiving.
tdd
Test-driven development. Use when the user wants to build features or fix bugs test-first, mentions "red-green-refactor", or wants integration tests.
write-bdd
Convert plain English requirements into Gherkin BDD scenarios.
javascript-testing-patterns
Implement comprehensive testing strategies using Jest, Vitest, and Testing Library for unit tests, integration tests, and end-to-end testing with mocking, fixtures, and test-driven development. Use when writing JavaScript/TypeScript tests, setting up test infrastructure, or implementing TDD/BDD workflows.
systematic-debugging
4-phase root cause debugging: understand bugs before fixing.