Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add BuildrAI/Buildr --skill task-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/BuildrAI/BuildrWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/buildrai/buildr/task-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/buildrai/buildr/task-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/buildrai/buildr/task-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/buildrai/buildr/task-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/buildrai/buildr/task-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.01261 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00504 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00252 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00126 |
Grade A, and why
task-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 63 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Task Review
本 Skill 是 buildr.task-review/v2 的默认 provider。Agent 完成判断,Task Review Application 保存方案与实现结果的独立当前结论及历次完整审查。
1. 确认审查目标
读取 canonical Workspace 中的正式 Task,确认 planning|completion 类型。面向用户称实现审查(Implementation Review),兼容接口类型仍为 completion,不改写已有结果或历史。先执行:
buildr task review inspect <task-id> --target <canonical-workspace> --json
再从真实工作现场取得本次对象及稳定 subjectIdentity:
- 方案可以来自当前 OpenSpec artifacts、任务清单、设计文档或其他专业 owner;直接使用当前对象或专业接口已返回的稳定身份。
- 完成结果可以是当前代码内容、Git commit/tree、文件产物、部署结果或外部系统结果。
- 实际对象位于独立Worktree时,使用matching Worktree evidence返回的checkout;否则核对当前Workspace、Project/Service registry与Git根。不要从cwd、分支名或旧Review Result猜测。
Review 是可选证据。Task Verification、任务收尾和 Parent 管理都不因 Result 缺失、changes-requested 或旧对象而自动阻塞。
先从 task inspect 的 record.brief 读取当前任务说明(Task Brief),再分别依据正文、真实方案选择、范围、风险及用户要求判断方案审查(Planning Review)和实现审查(Implementation Review),不因 change-flow 自动两次审查,也不因无变更(Change)、code-only 或 spec-maintenance 排除需要的审查。
planning审方案选择:核对问题、目标、边界和完成依据是否被真实方案覆盖,检查完整性、合理性、一致性、关键取舍与风险。方案可来自任务文档、设计、清单或专业产物;OpenSpec artifacts 只是来源之一。需要时在方案对象可读、取舍尚可调整时执行。completion审实现兑现:实现对象稳定后,对照当前任务说明与适用方案核对真实成果;没有正式方案或未执行planning也可独立执行,不补造方案或假设方案已通过。
需要但未完成、材料缺失、未执行、确实不适用、发现问题与已接受分别如实说明。需要或不适用的理由必须通过工作摘要(Work Context)的 checks 结论显式留痕(task work-context record --check planning-review|implementation-review --check-status needed|not-applicable --check-reason <理由>),不只留在对话或临时文本中,不新增专业状态库;专业应用只保存已形成的真实结论。记录缺失、changes-requested 或旧对象不形成自动门禁,但必要目标或风险尚未解决时不得报整体完成;未完成不能称不适用或已通过。
2. 动态审查
根据 Task Intent、当前对象、工程风险和用户要求决定阅读范围,使用现有文件、Git、测试、浏览器、外部系统或其他专业工具重新观察。正常软件开发中,例如:方案审查检查接口边界、兼容性和测试安排;完成审查检查真实代码差异、关键测试结果及用户要求是否兑现。
记录:
reviewed:至少一个实际审阅的可移植对象;uncovered:相关但未审阅的对象及真实原因;findings:简洁事实,可以为空;conclusion:accepted|changes-requested和非空摘要。
同一 Agent 自审使用 self;只有另一 Agent 完整执行才使用 independent-agent;只有人给出本次结论才使用 human。不要保存隐藏推理、session、model、完整日志或凭证。
3. 原子记录
完整结论形成后,用 inspect 返回的同类型 resultDigest 作为 --expected-current;槽位不存在时使用 absent:
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago Changed e0d822c43fc1
- 9d ago Changed · +5 lines 0bcdd6f7b2e9
- 25d ago Changed · +2 lines ec29d632f520
- 1mo ago Changed · +2 lines a02ce5f6ef90
- 1mo ago Changed · -22 tokens per session c98dfe4e90f9
- 1mo ago Changed · -9 lines · -4 tokens per session 0c0afc598cec
- 1mo ago Changed 7a2fd2a25575
- 1mo ago First seen · 63 lines · 57 tokens per session scan A e37e9a085b37
task-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository BuildrAI/Buildr (28 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 1,261 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
chronicle
Analyze Copilot session history for standup reports, usage tips, session search, and session reindexing. Use when the user asks for a standup, daily summary, usage tips, workflow recommendations, wants to search or find past sessions by keyword/file/PR, wants to reindex their session store, or asks about deleting…
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
component-fixtures
Use when creating or updating component fixtures for screenshot testing or their shared infrastructure, or when designing UI components to be fixture-friendly. Covers fixture file structure, theming, service setup, CSS scoping, async rendering, validation, and common pitfalls.