shareholder-remedies

shareholder-remedies is a skill for Claude Code from Buildwise-Studios/claude-for-hk-law. It costs 45 tokens per session (1,569 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A guide to legal remedies available to shareholders under Hong Kong company law when a company is mismanaged or a shareholder is treated unfairly. Remedies are legal actions or other court measures used to address harm.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to assess unfair prejudice, director misconduct, self-dealing, exclusion from management, improper share dilution, information failures, derivative actions, or winding-up options.
Why use it?
It helps match a shareholder's complaint with possible court applications, claims, interim protection, or settlement considerations.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Needs its repository: it runs a file that does not travel with it, so clone the repository first. The line is python3 scripts/check_company.py C1234567.

Part of the corporate-legal plugin — 15 skills, 1 agent shipped together

Good fit Use it to assess unfair prejudice, director misconduct, self-dealing, exclusion from management, improper share dilution, information failures, derivative actions, or winding-up options.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install

Getting it into your agent

It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Buildwise-Studios/claude-for-hk-law
agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/buildwise-studios/claude-for-hk-law/shareholder-remedies

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install corporate-legal, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 15 skills, 1 agent.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for shareholder-remedies

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/buildwise-studios/claude-for-hk-law/shareholder-remedies/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/buildwise-studios/claude-for-hk-law/shareholder-remedies)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/buildwise-studios/claude-for-hk-law/shareholder-remedies"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/buildwise-studios/claude-for-hk-law/shareholder-remedies/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for shareholder-remedies

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/buildwise-studios/claude-for-hk-law/shareholder-remedies"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/buildwise-studios/claude-for-hk-law/shareholder-remedies.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 45 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,569 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00045 $0.01569
Opus 5 $0.00023 $0.00785
Sonnet 5 $0.00009 $0.00314
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00157

Measured 12d ago against content hash 3187aae1f724, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

shareholder-remedies scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

corporate-legal/skills/shareholder-remedies/SKILL.md · 178 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 178 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Shareholder Remedies — Skill

Purpose

Advise shareholders on remedies available under Hong Kong company law for corporate misconduct, director breaches, and unfairly prejudicial conduct, including unfair prejudice petitions, derivative actions, and just and equitable winding up.

Scope

  • Unfair Prejudice Petition (s.724 Cap 622)
  • Statutory Derivative Action (ss.731–738 Cap 622)
  • Winding Up on Just and Equitable Grounds (s.177(1)(f) Cap 32)
  • Injunctions and interim relief
  • Investigation by Financial Secretary (s.143 Cap 622)
  • Common law remedies (personal claims, Foss v Harbottle exceptions)
  • Strategic considerations: choice of remedy, costs, settlement

Workflow

1. Identify the Grievance

  • Mismanagement or director self-dealing?
  • Exclusion from management (quasi-partnership)?
  • Misfeasance, misappropriation, or breach of duty?
  • Failure to provide information?
  • Unfair dilution or share issuance?
  • Oppression of minority?

2. Evaluate Available Remedies

Unfair Prejudice (s.724 Cap 622)

Threshold: Company's affairs conducted in an unfairly prejudicial manner to members (including petitioner).

Key elements:

  • Legitimate expectation of participation (common in quasi-partnerships)
  • Breach of trust or confidence
  • Unfairness judged objectively
  • Prejudice to petitioner's interests (not necessarily financial)

Orders available (s.725):

  • Purchase of petitioner's shares (most common — fair value determined by court)
  • Regulation of future company conduct
  • Injunction or other order

Typical cases:

  • Re Chime Corporation Ltd — leading HK authority
  • Re Tai Lap Investment Co Ltd — quasi-partnership principles
  • Re Wong Kwok Keong v Goldveon Ltd — exclusion from management
Derivative Action (ss.731–738 Cap 622)

Threshold: Member may apply for leave (court permission) to bring proceedings in company's name.

Court considers:

  • Prima facie case
  • Good faith of applicant
  • Interests of the company
  • Alternative remedies available
  • Likelihood of success

Read the full file on GitHub · 178 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 178 lines · 45 tokens per session scan A 3187aae1f724

Subscribe to this mod's changes

shareholder-remedies is a skill published in the GitHub repository Buildwise-Studios/claude-for-hk-law (5 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 45 tokens to every session and 1,569 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

c2pa-metadata

Embed a C2PA provenance manifest into an AI-generated marketing asset (PNG, JPG, WebP, GIF, TIFF, MP4, MOV, WebM, MP3, WAV, PDF) via scripts/embed-c2pa.py — produces a signed copy of the file carrying IPTC digital-source-type AI claims, an optional c2pa.ai-disclosure assertion for EU AI Act Article 50 (applicable 2…

indranilbanerjee/digital-marketing-pro · 183 tokens

employment-compliance

Covers the employment rules that carry real penalties — exempt and non-exempt classification, overtime and hours, employee versus contractor status, work authorization and recordkeeping, accommodation requests, and the notices and retention obligations that go with them. Use this to classify a role, review a…

cbrock84/headcount · 87 tokens

privacy-jp

A Japanese-language document generator for services built with Next.js. It creates privacy policies, terms of service, consent dialogs, and cookie banners while considering Japan's personal-information and consumer-protection laws.

kimlawtech/korean-privacy-terms · 74 tokens

revenue-recognition

Determines when and how revenue is recognized — performance obligations, contract terms that change the answer, and the deal structures that create accounting problems. Use this to work out how a contract should be recognized, review a non-standard deal before it is signed, understand deferred revenue, or spot terms…

cbrock84/headcount · 69 tokens

contract-review

Reviews and negotiates commercial agreements — MSAs, SOWs, order forms, NDAs, vendor and data-processing agreements — identifying material risk, proposing positions, and recommending a path rather than listing issues. Use this to review a contract before signature, prepare a negotiation position, build fallback…

cbrock84/headcount · 74 tokens

privacy-and-data-protection

Assesses and improves how personal data is collected, used, shared, and retained — data mapping, lawful basis, consent, processor agreements, subject rights, and breach obligations. Use this before launching anything that handles personal data, when adding a vendor that will process it, when a data subject request…

cbrock84/headcount · 86 tokens