Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Buildwise-Studios/claude-for-hk-lawnpx agentmods add skills/buildwise-studios/claude-for-hk-law/tabular-reviewWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/buildwise-studios/claude-for-hk-law/tabular-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/buildwise-studios/claude-for-hk-law/tabular-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/buildwise-studios/claude-for-hk-law/tabular-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/buildwise-studios/claude-for-hk-law/tabular-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/buildwise-studios/claude-for-hk-law/tabular-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00124 | $0.04044 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00062 | $0.02022 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00025 | $0.00809 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00404 |
Grade A, and why
tabular-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
95% identical to tabular-review — 10 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 236 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/tabular-review
- Load
~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-hk-law/corporate-legal/CLAUDE.md→ diligence structure, thresholds, house format. - Confirm: what documents, what columns, where does the output go.
- Build the typed schema. Write
.review-schema.yaml. Confirm with the user. - Sample run (3–5 docs). Adjust schema. Confirm.
- Fan out — one sub-agent per document, parallel. Each cell: value + state + verbatim quote + location.
- Normalization pass. Flag outliers and inconsistencies.
- Output:
.xlsxor Google Sheets (ask which), plus.csv+_sources.csv+ markdown always. Work-product header. - Summary: verification workload (counts of not_present / unclear / needs_review per column), flagged columns, where the files are, reminder that every cell is a lead not a finding.
/corporate-legal:tabular-review
/corporate-legal:tabular-review --schema .review-schema.yaml --docs ./vdr/02-Contracts/
/corporate-legal:tabular-review --template ma-diligence
--schema <path>: Use an existing schema file instead of building one. Useful for re-runs and incremental additions.
--template <name>: Start from a template in references/. Currently: ma-diligence.
--docs <path>: Document source. A local folder, a Drive folder ID, or a VDR path. If omitted, asks.
--output <xlsx|gsheets|csv>: Output format. If omitted, asks.
--sample <n>: Sample size for the schema check. Default 5.
Matter context
Matter context. Check ## Matter workspaces in the practice-level CLAUDE.md. If Enabled is ✗ (the default for in-house users), skip the rest of this paragraph — skills use practice-level context and the matter machinery is invisible. If enabled and there is no active matter, ask: "Which matter is this for? Run /corporate-legal:matter-workspace switch <slug> or say practice-level." Load the active matter's matter.md for matter-specific context and overrides. Write outputs to the matter folder at ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-hk-law/corporate-legal/matters/<matter-slug>/. Never read another matter's files unless Cross-matter context is on.
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 236 lines · 124 tokens per session scan A f2730bde2089
tabular-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository Buildwise-Studios/claude-for-hk-law (5 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 124 tokens to every session and 4,044 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 95% identical to tabular-review, differing in 10 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
cloud-service-agreement
Draft and fill SaaS agreement templates — cloud contract, MSA, order form, software license, pilot agreement, design partner agreement. Includes variants with SLAs and AI terms. Produces signable DOCX from Common Paper standard forms. Use when user says "SaaS agreement," "cloud contract," "MSA," "order form,"…
data-privacy-agreement
Draft and fill data privacy contract and agreement templates — DPA, data processing contract, GDPR, HIPAA BAA, business associate agreement, AI addendum. Produces signable DOCX files from Common Paper standard forms. Use when user says "DPA," "data processing agreement," "HIPAA BAA," "business associate agreement," or…
analyze-document
Forensically analyse a family court document using the 13-point protocol. Use when the user says "analyse this document", "review this affidavit", "what does this report say", "break down this letter", uploads a court document, affidavit, family report, solicitor letter, or any legal document related to their family…
parse-calendar
Parse a monthly content calendar from DOCX, XLSX, Notion, or pasted text into structured calendar-data.json — the source of truth every downstream skill reads. Triggers on "/parse-calendar", "parse the calendar", "import this calendar", "here is the month", "load the content plan", "calendar to JSON", or whenever a…
case-setup
Set up a new family court case vault from scratch. Use when the user says "set up my case", "start my case vault", "I need to organise my family court case", "help me build a case", "create my evidence vault", or is beginning a new family court matter and needs structure.
nda
Draft and fill NDA contract templates — mutual NDA, one-way NDA, confidentiality agreement. Produces signable DOCX files from Common Paper and Bonterms standard forms. Use when user says "NDA," "non-disclosure agreement," "confidentiality contract," "confidentiality agreement," "mutual NDA," or "one-way NDA." Includes…