Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add buiphucminhtam/forgewright --skill code-quality-engineergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/buiphucminhtam/forgewrightWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/buiphucminhtam/forgewright/code-quality-engineer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/buiphucminhtam/forgewright/code-quality-engineer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/buiphucminhtam/forgewright/code-quality-engineer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/buiphucminhtam/forgewright/code-quality-engineer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/buiphucminhtam/forgewright/code-quality-engineer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00061 | $0.01726 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00690 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00345 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00173 |
Grade A, and why
code-quality-engineer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 288 lines · 61 tokens per session scan A f6ac589926b0
code-quality-engineer is a skill published in the GitHub repository buiphucminhtam/forgewright (49 stars, last pushed 2d ago), with no licence file. It adds 61 tokens to every session and 1,726 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
superpowers-zh
Use when constraining AI coding with Chinese TDD methodology, systematic debugging, code review, and verification workflows. Superpowers-zh: Chinese adaptation of the Superpowers AI-assisted programming skills and methodologies.
fix
Structured bug fix — reproduce (failing test), diagnose, fix (minimal change), verify, commit. Enforces test-first. Use when a bug needs a methodical fix.
tdd
A test-first development workflow that writes a failing test before the code, then makes it pass and improves the design.
debugging
Diagnose a failure, fix its root cause and verify the original scenario. Triggers on "debug", "调试".
regression-test
Classify an iOS/Swift bug into its Apple-specific root-cause class (force unwrap, try!, fatalError, MainActor isolation, App Group mismatch, lifecycle) and sweep for sibling instances of that class. Complements a generic TDD/debugging skill (e.g. superpowers:test-driven-development, superpowers:systematic-debugging)…
software-development-workflows
Use when planning, debugging, testing, reviewing, simplifying, or spiking code changes across languages: systematic debugging, TDD, debugpy/Node inspectors, code cleanup, and implementation strategy.