Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add buiphucminhtam/forgewright --skill llm-testergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/buiphucminhtam/forgewrightWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/buiphucminhtam/forgewright/llm-tester)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/buiphucminhtam/forgewright/llm-tester"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/buiphucminhtam/forgewright/llm-tester/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/buiphucminhtam/forgewright/llm-tester"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/buiphucminhtam/forgewright/llm-tester.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00049 | $0.01000 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00500 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00200 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00100 |
Grade A, and why
llm-tester scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 116 lines · 49 tokens per session scan A a9098c260584
llm-tester is a skill published in the GitHub repository buiphucminhtam/forgewright (49 stars, last pushed 4d ago), with no licence file. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 1,000 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
prompt-regression
Use when the user has changed a prompt (system prompt, RAG template, agent instruction, etc.) and wants to know whether the candidate is better or worse than the baseline. Also use when the user mentions prompt A/B testing, prompt comparison, prompt optimization validation, "did my prompt change help," or prompt…
ai-observability-promptfoo
Testing and evaluation framework for LLM prompts and applications -- promptfooconfig.yaml, assertions, model-graded evals, red teaming, CI/CD integration, custom providers, and comparative evaluation.
Prompt Version Control Workflow
Sets up a prompt versioning system with naming conventions, diff tracking, A/B evaluation gates before promotion, and rollback triggers.
prompt-optimization-loop
Prompt-engineering expertise for designing test cases, edge cases, adversarial inputs, and iterating on prompts based on eval results.
prompt-evaluation-runner
Use when evaluating prompts, LLM outputs, red-team suites, or model behavior with local eval configs and safe provider/cost controls.
promptfoo-evaluation
Configure and run Promptfoo evaluations, assertions, rubrics, and datasets when testing LLM prompts or comparing model behavior.