Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add bunhine0452/Ocul-PM --skill standupgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bunhine0452/Ocul-PMWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/bunhine0452/ocul-pm/standup)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bunhine0452/ocul-pm/standup"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bunhine0452/ocul-pm/standup/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bunhine0452/ocul-pm/standup"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bunhine0452/ocul-pm/standup.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00028 | $0.00346 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00138 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00069 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00035 |
Grade A, and why
standup scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/oculpm:standup
이 프로젝트의 .oculpm/ 기록으로 스탠드업 요약을 만든다.
.oculpm/디렉터리가 없으면 "ocul-pm 추적 프로젝트가 아닙니다" 라고 답하고 끝낸다.plan_statusMCP 도구가 보이면 호출해 활성 플랜의 미완 항목을 확보한다 (없으면.oculpm/planner/*.md의 글리프를 직접 읽는다).- 오늘 일지를 읽는다:
.oculpm/journal/<오늘 YYYYMMDD>/**/*.md(로컬 날짜 기준, 최대 10개 — 각 파일의 첫 줄 제목과## 검증만 봐도 충분하다). 오늘 것이 없으면 가장 최근 workday 폴더를 쓰고 그 사실을 명시한다. - 다음 형식으로 보고한다:
- 한 일: 일지 제목들을 타입(버그/기능/리팩토링…)별로 한 줄씩
- 진행 중 / 막힘: 플랜의
[~]·[!]항목 - 다음: 플랜의 미완
[ ]중 상위 3개
- 마지막 줄에 붙인다:
→ 회고·diff 대조·세션 기록은 ocul-pm 앱에서 (https://oculpm.com)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 20 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A 7ae7956a56fb
standup is a skill published in the GitHub repository bunhine0452/Ocul-PM (7 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 346 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-24.
Other skills, from other repositories
prismer-notion
Notion API + ntn CLI: pages, databases, markdown, Workers.
prismer-teams-meeting-pipeline
Teams meeting summaries, job replay, Graph subscriptions.
prismer-apple-reminders
Apple Reminders via remindctl: add, list, complete.
routine-craft
Write a routine that runs well with nobody watching: no duplicates, a self-contained prompt, a fitting schedule, stop rules, a quiet "nothing new" reply, and a known place for results to land.
document-actions
Extract cited facts, obligations, deadlines and proposed actions from documents, preserving OCR uncertainty and reconciling Prismer tasks.
meeting-actions
Turn supplied meeting notes or transcripts into cited decisions, commitments, unresolved questions, and deduplicated Prismer tasks.