Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to bybren-llc/rendertrust. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/bybren-llc/rendertrust/dev/.claude/skills/testing-patterns/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bybren-llc/rendertrustWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/bybren-llc/rendertrust/testing-patterns)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bybren-llc/rendertrust/testing-patterns"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bybren-llc/rendertrust/testing-patterns.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00038 | $0.01531 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00766 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00306 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00153 |
Grade A, and why
testing-patterns scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 274 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Testing Patterns Skill
Purpose
Guide consistent and effective testing. Routes to existing test patterns and provides evidence templates for Linear.
When This Skill Applies
Invoke this skill when:
- Writing new unit tests
- Creating integration tests
- Setting up test fixtures with RLS
- Running test suites
- Packaging test evidence for Linear
Critical Rules
❌ FORBIDDEN Patterns
// FORBIDDEN: Direct Prisma calls in tests (bypass RLS)
const user = await prisma.user.findUnique({ where: { user_id } });
// FORBIDDEN: Shared test state (causes flaky tests)
let sharedUser: User;
beforeAll(() => { sharedUser = createUser(); });
// FORBIDDEN: Hard-coded IDs (test pollution)
const userId = "user-123";
// FORBIDDEN: Missing cleanup (leaky tests)
it("creates user", async () => {
await prisma.user.create({ data: userData });
// No cleanup!
});
✅ CORRECT Patterns
// CORRECT: Use RLS context helpers
const user = await withSystemContext(prisma, "test", async (client) => {
return client.user.findUnique({ where: { user_id } });
});
// CORRECT: Isolated test state per test
beforeEach(() => {
const testUser = createTestUser();
});
// CORRECT: Unique identifiers
const userId = `user-${crypto.randomUUID()}`;
const email = `test-${Date.now()}@example.com`;
// CORRECT: Proper cleanup
afterEach(async () => {
await withSystemContext(prisma, "test", async (client) => {
await client.user.deleteMany({ where: { email: { contains: "test-" } } });
});
});
Test Directory Structure
__tests__/
├── unit/ # Fast, isolated tests
│ ├── components/ # React component tests
│ ├── lib/ # Library function tests
│ ├── services/ # Service layer tests
│ └── user/ # User helper tests
├── integration/ # API and database tests
├── database/ # Database helper tests
├── e2e/ # End-to-end tests (Playwright)
├── payments/ # Payment flow tests
└── setup.ts # Global test setup
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 274 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A 393d2a0686f6
testing-patterns is a skill published in the GitHub repository bybren-llc/rendertrust (7 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 1,531 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
Other skills, from other repositories
axiom-testing
Use when writing ANY test, debugging flaky tests, making tests faster, or choosing Swift Testing vs XCTest. Covers unit tests, UI tests, async testing, test architecture.
designing-tests
Designs and implements testing strategies for any codebase. Use when adding tests, improving coverage, setting up testing infrastructure, debugging test failures, or when asked about unit tests, integration tests, or E2E testing.
test-automation
Execute Vitest and Playwright test suites with result collection and failure analysis.
testing-blocks
Use this when you have made AEM Edge Delivery Services code changes to blocks, scripts, or styles and need to validate them before opening a pull request. Covers unit testing for utilities and logic, browser testing with Playwright, linting, and guidance on what to test and how.
prd-auto-test-loop
A testing workflow driven by a product requirements document (PRD), which describes what a software version should do. It turns acceptance criteria into unit, integration, and end-to-end tests, then records the plan and results.
test-automation-expert
Comprehensive test automation specialist covering unit, integration, and E2E testing strategies. Expert in Jest, Vitest, Playwright, Cypress, pytest, and modern testing frameworks. Guides test pyramid design, coverage optimization, flaky test detection, and CI/CD integration. Activate on 'test strategy', 'unit tests'…