Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add byerlikaya/claude-starter-kit --skill incident-runbookgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/byerlikaya/claude-starter-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/byerlikaya/claude-starter-kit/incident-runbook)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/byerlikaya/claude-starter-kit/incident-runbook"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/byerlikaya/claude-starter-kit/incident-runbook/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/byerlikaya/claude-starter-kit/incident-runbook"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/byerlikaya/claude-starter-kit/incident-runbook.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00056 | $0.00570 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00228 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00114 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00057 |
Grade A, and why
incident-runbook scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 43 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Incident Response & Runbook
Trigger phrases: "incident", "incident response", "runbook", "postmortem", "root cause", "outage", "production incident", "post-incident"
Two modes: live incident (what to do right now) and aftermath (postmortem + runbook). Priority: stopping user impact > finding the root cause. No panic, one ordered step at a time.
Live incident — sequence
- Acknowledge & classify — what is the impact (who, how much), severity (SEV1 full outage … SEV3 minor).
- Mitigate the impact FIRST — rollback, turn off a feature flag, shift traffic, scale up. Without waiting on the root cause.
- Single coordinator — it is clear who decides; communication goes through one channel.
- Diagnose — last change? (deploy/migration/config) narrow it down with logs+metrics+traces (observability).
- Resolve — the smallest safe fix; then verify (health check).
- Close — confirm the impact is over; note the timeline (a postmortem input).
Mitigation reflexes
- Last deploy suspect → rollback (deploy revert).
- Suspect feature → turn off the feature flag.
- After a destructive migration → restore from backup (db-migration).
- Dependency/service down → circuit breaker / graceful degradation.
After the incident
Blameless postmortem + producing a durable runbook: references/postmortem.md.
Invariant rules
- Stop the impact, then understand — the root cause does not hold up the resolution.
- Blameless culture — the postmortem questions the system, not the person.
- Actions are owned + dated — no "we'll look at it later".
- The runbook is executable — real commands/steps, not wishes.
- Make learning permanent — the lesson goes into an adr/runbook/monitoring, it does not get lost.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 43 lines · 56 tokens per session scan A 542542df41bc
incident-runbook is a skill published in the GitHub repository byerlikaya/claude-starter-kit (24 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 56 tokens to every session and 570 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
oracle
Oracle second-model review: bundle prompts/files, debug, refactor, design.
skill-repair
Diagnose and fix failing or degraded skills automatically - systemic-first triage, per-category playbooks, and a verification plan.
self-improve
Improve the agent itself, or audit its recent performance - better skills, prompts, workflows, and config, plus a quality/reliability/memory-hygiene review of what it did and what failed.
posthog-errors
Weekly cross-project error overview from PostHog - enumerates every project the OAuth grant covers, pulls the last 7 days of error-tracking issues per project, ranks them by impact, flags what's new vs ongoing, and sends one digest with per-project totals, the top issues, and a clickable link to a full committed…
aeon-doctor
Static config-correctness linter for this instance - catches the silent-failure class (unquoted schedules, duplicate keys, unconfigured skills, mode typos, broken requires/MCP refs) that no run-based health skill can see. Notifies only on problems.
manage-skills
A maintenance workflow for checking whether project verification skills still cover the code and rules that changed during a session.