analyzing-docs

analyzing-docs is a skill for Claude Code from C0ntr0lledCha0s/claude-code-plugin-automations. It costs 54 tokens per session (1,221 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A guide for assessing the quality and coverage of documentation in a codebase. Documentation coverage means checking how much of the code and project information is explained for other developers.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to audit documentation, find gaps, assess quality, and produce coverage measurements. It checks items such as parameter and return descriptions, examples, docstrings, README content, and architecture guides.
Why use it?
It helps reveal missing or incomplete explanations instead of relying on whether a README happens to exist. It provides ways to assess documentation for functions, classes, files, APIs, and the project as a whole.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter.

Part of the documents-manager plugin — 3 skills, 4 commands, 1 agent shipped together

Good fit Use it to audit documentation, find gaps, assess quality, and produce coverage measurements. It checks items such as parameter and return descriptions, examples, docstrings, README content, and architecture guides.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/c0ntr0lledcha0s/claude-code-plugin-automations/analyzing-docs
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add C0ntr0lledCha0s/claude-code-plugin-automations --skill analyzing-docs
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/C0ntr0lledCha0s/claude-code-plugin-automations

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install documents-manager, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 3 skills, 4 commands, 1 agent.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for analyzing-docs

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/c0ntr0lledcha0s/claude-code-plugin-automations/analyzing-docs/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/c0ntr0lledcha0s/claude-code-plugin-automations/analyzing-docs)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/c0ntr0lledcha0s/claude-code-plugin-automations/analyzing-docs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/c0ntr0lledcha0s/claude-code-plugin-automations/analyzing-docs/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for analyzing-docs

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/c0ntr0lledcha0s/claude-code-plugin-automations/analyzing-docs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/c0ntr0lledcha0s/claude-code-plugin-automations/analyzing-docs.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 54 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,221 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 1 finding. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00054 $0.01221
Opus 5.5 $0.00022 $0.00488
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00011 $0.00244
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00122

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 642852665b0f, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

analyzing-docs scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Strips warnings and disclaimerslowAnti-refusal

Omitting safety caveats hides risk from the user and is a common jailbreak preamble.

- Security-sensitive code without warnings

Downgraded: this mod is about security review, or the phrase is quoted, so it is likely naming the pattern rather than instructing it.

documents-manager/skills/analyzing-docs/SKILL.md · 212 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 212 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Analyzing Documentation Skill

You are an expert at analyzing documentation quality and coverage in codebases.

When This Skill Activates

This skill auto-invokes when:

  • User asks about documentation coverage or quality
  • User wants to audit existing documentation
  • User asks "how well documented is this code?"
  • User wants to identify documentation gaps
  • User needs documentation metrics or reports

Documentation Coverage Analysis

Coverage Metrics to Track

  1. Function/Method Documentation

    • Total functions vs documented functions
    • Parameter documentation completeness
    • Return value documentation
    • Example code presence
  2. Class/Module Documentation

    • Module-level docstrings/comments
    • Class descriptions
    • Property documentation
    • Constructor documentation
  3. File-Level Documentation

    • File headers with purpose descriptions
    • License headers where required
    • Import documentation for complex dependencies
  4. Project-Level Documentation

    • README.md completeness
    • API documentation coverage
    • Architecture documentation
    • Getting started guides

Coverage Calculation

Coverage = (Documented Items / Total Items) * 100

Scoring:
- 90-100%: Excellent
- 70-89%:  Good
- 50-69%:  Needs Improvement
- <50%:    Critical

Quality Assessment Framework

Documentation Quality Dimensions

  1. Completeness (0-10)

    • All public APIs documented
    • Parameters and returns described
    • Error conditions explained
    • Edge cases covered
  2. Accuracy (0-10)

    • Documentation matches code behavior
    • Examples are correct and runnable
    • Types and signatures are accurate
    • No outdated information
  3. Clarity (0-10)

    • Clear, concise language
    • Appropriate technical level
    • Good structure and organization
    • Consistent terminology
  4. Usefulness (0-10)

    • Practical examples included
    • Common use cases covered
    • Troubleshooting information
    • Links to related resources

Read the full file on GitHub · 212 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 212 lines · 54 tokens per session scan A 642852665b0f

Subscribe to this mod's changes

analyzing-docs is a skill published in the GitHub repository C0ntr0lledCha0s/claude-code-plugin-automations (3 stars, last pushed 8mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 54 tokens to every session and 1,221 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (strips warnings and disclaimers). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

local-ai-agents

Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…

microsoft/ai-agents-for-beginners · 200 tokens

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

next-cache-components-adoption

Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…

vercel/next.js · 95 tokens

chat-pet-sprite-creation

Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.

microsoft/vscode · 53 tokens

cpu-profile-analysis

Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…

microsoft/vscode · 71 tokens

insight-error-page

Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…

vercel/next.js · 83 tokens