Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to c9r-io/orchestrator. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/c9r-io/orchestrator/main/.claude/skills/qa-doc-governance/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/c9r-io/orchestratorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/c9r-io/orchestrator/qa-doc-governance)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/c9r-io/orchestrator/qa-doc-governance"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/c9r-io/orchestrator/qa-doc-governance/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/c9r-io/orchestrator/qa-doc-governance"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/c9r-io/orchestrator/qa-doc-governance.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00066 | $0.00835 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00026 | $0.00334 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00167 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00084 |
Grade A, and why
qa-doc-governance scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 78 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
QA Doc Governance
Run a repeatable governance loop for QA documentation quality, consistency, and discoverability.
Workflow
- Baseline audit.
- Classify findings by severity and scope.
- Apply targeted remediation.
- Sync index and governance artifacts.
- Validate and publish audit result.
Step 1: Baseline Audit
- Run
scripts/qa-doc-lint.sh. - Run
./.claude/skills/qa-doc-governance/scripts/run-audit.shfor expanded metrics. - If needed, read
references/policy-checklist.mdfor rule definitions.
Step 2: Classify Findings
Use this priority order:
P0: Broken navigability or unusable test flow. : Examples: missing checklist, impossible auth/session steps, README index drift.P1: Governance drift. : Examples: too many scenarios in one file, missing UI entry visibility in UI-facing docs.P2: Style consistency improvements. : Examples: naming alignment, wording normalization.
Step 3: Remediate
Apply these rules in order:
- Fix executable correctness first. : Replace non-executable auth/session checks with explicit methods (incognito/private window, clear session cookie, explicit sign-out).
- Enforce mock-fixture-only for orchestrator workflows.
: QA docs must reference
fixtures/manifests/bundles/*mock fixtures (echo agents), neverdocs/workflow/*(real AI agents). Every doc must include explicitapply -f fixtures/...in preconditions. Standalone scenario stubs must inline precondition commands or cross-reference parent doc. Severity: P0. - Enforce visibility-first UI flows. : UI scenarios start from visible entry points (sidebar, tab, button, quick links), not direct URL.
- Enforce scenario cap.
: Keep each file
<=5numbered scenarios. Split long files into base/advanced or topic-specific docs. - Keep checklists mandatory.
: Every QA doc includes
## Checklist/## Regression Checklist(or localized equivalent).
Step 4: Sync Governance Artifacts
- Update
docs/qa/README.mdso index matches current docs. - If this repo uses
docs/qa/_manifest.yaml, regenerate it with scenario counts and governance flags. - If QA behavior changes affect security/UIUX expectations, add alignment notes to:
:
docs/security/README.md,docs/uiux/README.md. - Check
CHANGELOG.mdconsistency. : Entries under[Unreleased]have not shipped, so a stale one will publish as a false statement. Verify no unreleased entry describes a mechanism the repo has since removed or replaced, that removals appear under### Removed, and that user-visible incompatibilities are recorded with the exact diagnostic users will hit. Released sections are historical and stay as written.
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 78 lines · 66 tokens per session scan A db1c6399c73a
qa-doc-governance is a skill published in the GitHub repository c9r-io/orchestrator (21 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 66 tokens to every session and 835 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
codew-release-qa-sweep
Use before claiming Codewhale release work is done: run the full gate sweep and list the manual QA targets.
cw-gates
Use before claiming any Codewhale change is done, green, or ready to land: the focused-to-broad verification ladder, the budget checks CI enforces, and the rules for what counts as a passing test.
github-issue-to-pr
Implement one scafld-governed repository issue with normal host tools, prove the tested change through its finalize wall, and optionally publish the exact pull request through scoped provider authority with readback.
contributor-onboarding
Help a new contributor get productive on this checkout - inspect sync state against main, build, run the repository's exact verification gate, and produce a local what's-new digest. Never fetches, pulls, or modifies a dirty tree on its own. Explicit-only.
gh-find-prs
Survey open Codewhale PRs and triage each for mergeability and disposition against the real landing branch.
gh-assign-issues
Use to assign GitHub issues to a milestone and/or owners in bulk, verifying each.