WeReply: Skill for Claude Code

.claude/skills/code-review/SKILL.md

code-review is a skill for Claude Code from cacr92/WeReply. It costs 84 tokens per session (3,173 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A code-review guide for desktop applications built with Tauri, Rust, and React. It covers correctness, speed, security, maintainability, tests, and Tauri-specific patterns.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when reviewing pull requests, checking code quality, investigating issues, auditing security, or planning refactoring in a Tauri, Rust, and React project.
Why use it?
It helps reviewers check for bugs, security problems, performance issues, and project-rule violations across both the application interface and its underlying code.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/. Also seen: mentions CLAUDE.md.

This is cacr92/WeReply's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on WeReply itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything WeReply configures →

Needs its repository: it reads a path above its own folder, which exists only inside the repository. The line is import type { Formula, Material } from '../bindings';.

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to cacr92/WeReply. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cacr92/WeReply/main/.claude/skills/code-review/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cacr92/WeReply

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for code-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cacr92/wereply/code-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cacr92/wereply/code-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cacr92/wereply/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cacr92/wereply/code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for code-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cacr92/wereply/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cacr92/wereply/code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 84 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 3,173 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00084 $0.03173
Opus 5.5 $0.00034 $0.01269
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00017 $0.00635
Haiku 4.5 $0.00008 $0.00317

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 76b96024d29b, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/skills/code-review/SKILL.md · 514 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 514 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Code Review Skill

Comprehensive code review guidance for Tauri + Rust + React applications with focus on quality, security, and maintainability.

Overview

This skill provides systematic code review guidance covering:

  • Correctness: Logic errors, edge cases, type safety
  • Performance: Inefficient algorithms, resource leaks, optimization opportunities
  • Security: SQL injection, XSS, unsafe operations, data validation
  • Maintainability: Code duplication, naming, documentation, test coverage
  • Tauri-specific: Command patterns, specta attributes, desktop app constraints
  • Project-specific: Adherence to CLAUDE.md guidelines

When This Skill Applies

This skill activates when:

  • Reviewing pull requests or code changes
  • Performing code quality checks
  • Looking for bugs and issues
  • Suggesting refactoring opportunities
  • Auditing security vulnerabilities
  • Checking performance bottlenecks
  • Ensuring compliance with project standards

Code Review Framework

1. Pre-Review Checklist

Before diving into code details:

# Check git diff context
git diff main...feature-branch
git log --oneline main..feature-branch

# Verify tests pass
cargo test
npm test

# Check formatting
cargo fmt --check
npm run lint

Questions to answer:

  • What is the purpose of this change?
  • What files are modified? (Use git diff --stat)
  • Are there breaking changes?
  • Is test coverage adequate?
  • Does it follow project conventions?

2. Rust Backend Review

Command Pattern Review

✅ Correct Tauri Command:

#[tauri::command]
#[specta::specta]
pub async fn get_materials(
    state: State<'_, TauriAppState>,
) -> ApiResponse<Vec<Material>> {
    with_service(state, |ctx| async move {
        ctx.material_service.get_all().await
    })
    .await
}

Checklist:

  • #[tauri::command] attribute present
  • #[specta::specta] attribute present
  • Return type is ApiResponse<T>
  • Uses with_service helper or proper error handling
  • Async functions properly use await

Read the full file on GitHub · 514 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 514 lines · 84 tokens per session scan A 76b96024d29b

Subscribe to this mod's changes

code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository cacr92/WeReply (9 stars, last pushed 9mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 84 tokens to every session and 3,173 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

autoreview

Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.

openclaw/clawhub · 17 tokens

omh-code-review

This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).

rlaope/oh-my-hermes · 48 tokens

revdiff-plan

Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…

umputun/revdiff · 84 tokens

re0-merge

Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…

LilMGenius/paperthin · 70 tokens

explore-unknowns

Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…

dzhng/skills · 162 tokens

asplos-writing-style

Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and…

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills · 65 tokens