Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/calionauta/stelownpx agentmods add skills/calionauta/stelow/stelow-workflow-ux-critiqueWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/calionauta/stelow/stelow-workflow-ux-critique)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/calionauta/stelow/stelow-workflow-ux-critique"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/calionauta/stelow/stelow-workflow-ux-critique/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/calionauta/stelow/stelow-workflow-ux-critique"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/calionauta/stelow/stelow-workflow-ux-critique.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00095 | $0.02944 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00048 | $0.01472 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00589 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00294 |
Grade A, and why
stelow-workflow-ux-critique scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 318 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Standalone awareness: inside stelow, appetite gates critique depth (Lean → static a11y baseline, Core → codebase mode, Complete → live site). Standalone defaults to Core appetite (codebase/browserless mode, ~80% coverage). Works with URL, source directory, or screenshot — no stelow dependency for core audit logic.
UX Critique
Focus: Complete UX audit of interfaces — visual accessibility, usability, design, emotional journey, and AI slop detection. Inputs: URL (live site), directory (source code), or screenshot (image). Output: Classified report with gaps (🚨/🤔/🔎) + actionable recommendations.
Tools: See
../stelow-workflow-orchestrator/references/cli-tools/agent_browser.mdand../stelow-workflow-orchestrator/references/cli-tools/subagents.mdfor tool patterns.
Overview
Full UX audit for visual interfaces — accessibility (WCAG AA), Nielsen heuristics, visual hierarchy, cognitive load, consistency, mobile/responsive, AI slop, emotional journey, and design personas.
Accepts 3 input types, each activating a different subset of dimensions:
| Input | Detects | Dimensions covered |
|---|---|---|
| URL | http:// or https:// |
All — full live audit |
| Codebase | Source code directory | ~80% without browser (except exact contrast, real keyboard, screen reader) |
| Screenshot | .png .jpg .webp file |
~60% — visual hierarchy, AI slop, estimated contrast, cognitive load |
Appetite Gate (auto-skip for scopes without UI changes)
Before running UX critique, check if the scope involves visual UI changes and if appetite warrants a full audit.
# Read appetite from stelow context or env var; default Core (via canonical helper).
WF_DIR="$(ls -td .stelow/*/*/ 2>/dev/null | head -1)"
# shellcheck disable=SC1091
source "$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]:-$0}")/../../stelow-workflow-orchestrator/references/cli-tools/read-config.sh"
APPETITE="${APPETITE:-$(stelow_read_appetite)}"
# Check if any visual files changed
UI_FILES=$(git diff --name-only HEAD~1 2>/dev/null | grep -cE '\.(templ|html|tsx|jsx|css)$' || echo "0")
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago Changed cd7a7ca260ee
- 11d ago First seen · 318 lines · 95 tokens per session scan A ca66c9264900
stelow-workflow-ux-critique is a skill published in the GitHub repository calionauta/stelow (10 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 95 tokens to every session and 2,944 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
chakra-ui-builder
Build responsive, accessible UI components and layouts using Chakra UI v3, install or configure Chakra UI in new and existing projects, and design scalable themes using tokens, semantic tokens, recipes, and slot recipes. Use this skill whenever a user asks to build, create, or generate any UI component, page, form…
visual-ralph
Visual Ralph orchestration for frontend UI from generated references, static references, or live URL targets, using $ralph with built-in visual verdict and pixel-diff evidence until the implementation matches and leaves a reproducible design system.
frontend-ui-dark-ts
Build dark-themed React applications using Tailwind CSS with custom theming, glassmorphism effects, and Framer Motion animations. Use when creating dashboards, admin panels, or data-rich interfaces with a refined dark aesthetic.
reveal-hover-effect
Build cursor-following spotlight reveals that expose a second aligned image through a soft radial mask. Use for hover-to-color, before-and-after, x-ray, material, texture, product-detail, and illustrated hero effects where a desaturated or embossed base image should remain visible while another treatment follows an…
frontend-visual-qa
Audits already-rendered web, landing-page, HTML deck/slide, browser tool/game, dashboard/admin, design-system, and desktop UIs using real-browser or native-app journeys, inspected screenshots, DOM geometry, responsive or projection viewports, and a bundled Playwright sweep. Use after UI implementation to find…
prototype-web
A clickable, high-fidelity web product prototype with navigation, a hero section, feature cards, steps, social proof, and optional pricing. It is designed to resemble a finished landing page while remaining a prototype.