Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/calionauta/stelownpx agentmods add skills/calionauta/stelow/stelow-workflow-ux-critiqueWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/calionauta/stelow/stelow-workflow-ux-critique)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/calionauta/stelow/stelow-workflow-ux-critique"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/calionauta/stelow/stelow-workflow-ux-critique/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/calionauta/stelow/stelow-workflow-ux-critique"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/calionauta/stelow/stelow-workflow-ux-critique.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00095 | $0.03545 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00038 | $0.01418 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00709 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00354 |
Grade A, and why
stelow-workflow-ux-critique scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 14d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 363 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Standalone awareness: inside stelow, quality gates critique depth (experimental → static a11y baseline, production → live site). Standalone defaults to production quality (live-site mode when a URL exists, else codebase/browserless mode, ~80% coverage). Works with URL, source directory, or screenshot — no stelow dependency for core audit logic.
UX Critique
Focus: Complete UX audit of interfaces — visual accessibility, usability, design, emotional journey, and AI slop detection. Inputs: URL (live site), directory (source code), or screenshot (image). Output: Classified report with gaps (🚨/🤔/🔎) + actionable recommendations.
Tools: See
../stelow-workflow-orchestrator/references/cli-tools/agent_browser.mdand../stelow-workflow-orchestrator/references/cli-tools/subagents.mdfor tool patterns, and../stelow-workflow-orchestrator/references/cli-tools/ui-design-research.mdfor reference exemplars. The browser is the only source of rendered evidence about the build under review; a design-reference MCP is an archive of other sites and cannot supply it.
Overview
Full UX audit for visual interfaces — accessibility (WCAG AA), Nielsen heuristics, visual hierarchy, cognitive load, consistency, mobile/responsive, AI slop, emotional journey, and design personas.
Accepts 3 input types, each activating a different subset of dimensions:
| Input | Detects | Dimensions covered |
|---|---|---|
| URL | http:// or https:// |
All — full live audit |
| Codebase | Source code directory | ~80% without browser (except exact contrast, real keyboard, screen reader) |
| Screenshot | .png .jpg .webp file |
~60% — visual hierarchy, AI slop, estimated contrast, cognitive load |
Quality Gate (auto-skip for scopes without UI changes)
Before running UX critique, check if the scope involves visual UI changes and if quality warrants a full audit.
# Read quality from stelow context or env var; default production (via canonical helper).
WF_DIR="$(ls -td .stelow/*/*/ 2>/dev/null | head -1)"
# shellcheck disable=SC1091
source "$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]:-$0}")/../../stelow-workflow-orchestrator/references/cli-tools/read-config.sh"
QUALITY="${QUALITY:-$(stelow_read_quality)}"
# Check if any visual files changed (entity evidence first, churn count fallback)
UI_FILES=$(sem diff --format json HEAD~1 2>/dev/null | python3 -c "import sys,json; print(sum(1 for e in json.load(sys.stdin).get('entities', []) if str(e.get('file','')).endswith(('.templ','.html','.tsx','.jsx','.css'))))" 2>/dev/null || git diff --name-only HEAD~1 2>/dev/null | grep -cE '\.(templ|html|tsx|jsx|css)$' || echo "0")
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 14d ago Changed · +5 lines fb09e10e7216
- 1mo ago Changed · -2 lines 755319d5c58b
- 1mo ago Changed 24f55151bfe9
- 1mo ago Changed · +4 lines cb3b449004af
- 1mo ago Changed · +6 lines 447f2b0483b1
- 1mo ago Changed · +2 lines 10fa01afea50
- 1mo ago Changed · +26 lines ac623ab542ee
- 1mo ago Changed · +4 lines 45ee8ee3162e
- 1mo ago Changed cd7a7ca260ee
- 2mo ago First seen · 318 lines · 95 tokens per session scan A ca66c9264900
stelow-workflow-ux-critique is a skill published in the GitHub repository calionauta/stelow (14 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 95 tokens to every session and 3,545 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
stelow-workflow-ux-critique compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| stelow-workflow-ux-critiquecalionauta/stelow | Skill | 14 | 9d ago | MIT | A | 95 | Claude Code, Codex |
| anti-slop-designsickn33/agentic-awesome-skills | Skill | 49k | yesterday | MIT | A | 34 | Claude Code |
| chakra-ui-builderchakra-ui/chakra-ui | Skill | 41k | yesterday | MIT | A | 214 | Claude Code, Codex |
| visual-ralphYeachan-Heo/oh-my-codex | Skill | 34k | 3d ago | MIT | A | 52 | Codex |
| open-design-setupcompozy/compozy | Skill | 2.8k | yesterday | MIT | A | 67 | Claude Code, Codex |
| frontend-visual-qadaymade/claude-code-skills | Skill | 1.5k | yesterday | MIT | A | 125 | Claude Code, Codex |
| prototype-webnexu-io/html-anything | Skill | 9.4k | 25d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 24 | Claude Code, Codex |