Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add camilooscargbaptista/cto-toolkit --skill csharp-dotnet-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/camilooscargbaptista/cto-toolkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/camilooscargbaptista/cto-toolkit/csharp-dotnet-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/camilooscargbaptista/cto-toolkit/csharp-dotnet-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/camilooscargbaptista/cto-toolkit/csharp-dotnet-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/camilooscargbaptista/cto-toolkit/csharp-dotnet-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/camilooscargbaptista/cto-toolkit/csharp-dotnet-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.00647 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00324 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00129 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00065 |
Grade A, and why
csharp-dotnet-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 80 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
C# / .NET Code Review
When to Use
- Reviewing C#/.NET code (ASP.NET Core, EF Core, Minimal APIs)
- Evaluating .NET architecture patterns (Clean Architecture, CQRS, MediatR)
- Azure service integration review
Review Checklist
Architecture & Patterns
- Clean Architecture: Domain independent of infrastructure
- Dependency Injection used throughout (no
new Service()) - CQRS separation when appropriate (Commands vs Queries)
- MediatR or similar for decoupled handlers
- Repository pattern for data access abstraction
- Options pattern for configuration (
IOptions<T>)
C# Best Practices
-
async/awaitused correctly (no.Resultor.Wait()) -
CancellationTokenpropagated through async chains -
IDisposableimplemented for unmanaged resources -
nullhandled with nullable reference types (?,??,?.) - Records used for immutable DTOs
-
sealedclasses where inheritance not needed -
readonlyfor immutable fields - Pattern matching instead of type casting
EF Core
- No N+1 queries (use
.Include()or.AsSplitQuery()) -
AsNoTracking()for read-only queries - Indexes defined on frequently queried columns
- Migrations tested and reversible
- Connection pooling configured
- Query filters for soft delete / multi-tenancy
Security
-
[Authorize]on all protected endpoints - Input validation with data annotations or FluentValidation
- Anti-forgery tokens for forms
- CORS configured restrictively
- User secrets / Azure Key Vault for credentials
- No SQL string concatenation (parameterized queries)
Performance
- Response caching where appropriate
-
IMemoryCacheorIDistributedCachefor hot data - Minimal API for high-throughput endpoints
-
System.Text.Jsonconfigured (not Newtonsoft unless needed) - Pagination on list endpoints
- Background tasks via
IHostedService/ Hangfire
Output Format
## .NET Review: [Component]
**Health Score**: X/10
### Critical Issues
- [Issue with fix]
### Improvements
- [Suggestion with example]
### Architecture Notes
- [Pattern observations]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 80 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A 9b672becdddc
csharp-dotnet-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository camilooscargbaptista/cto-toolkit (7 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 647 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
recipe-front-review
Reviews completed frontend implementation for governing-source compliance, scope economy, repository quality, and security, then applies user-approved React corrections.
graphify-dotnet
Use graphify-dotnet to generate codebase knowledge graphs, architecture snapshots, and exportable repository maps from .NET or polyglot source trees, with optional AI-enriched semantic relationships. USE FOR: graphify commands; graph JSON, HTML, SVG, Cypher, Markdown, and Obsidian exports; repository map and…
new-skill
Scaffold a new brooks-lint analysis skill so it passes npm run validate and npm run evals on the first try — generates skills/{name}/SKILL.md (with the mandatory "Do NOT trigger for:" clause and a Process section citing guide step ranges) plus skills/{name}/{name}-guide.md (sequentially numbered steps), then appends…
brooks-sweep
Full-sweep mode: runs a unified analysis across all quality dimensions — code decay, architecture, tech debt, and test quality — then applies fixes directly to the codebase. Safe changes are auto-applied; risky changes are confirmed before execution. Drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user…
dorodango
Polishes working code through successive quality passes in fresh subagents. Use after tests pass when code needs multi-dimension refinement before release.
address-review
Read PR review comments from GitHub, evaluate, address, and reply.