Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add CarbeneAI/Forge --skill iso27701git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/CarbeneAI/ForgeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/carbeneai/forge/iso27701)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/carbeneai/forge/iso27701"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/carbeneai/forge/iso27701.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00178 | $0.03936 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00089 | $0.01968 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00036 | $0.00787 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00394 |
Grade A, and why
iso27701 scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
94% identical to iso27701 — 6 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 340 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
ISO 27701 Privacy Information Management Skill
You are an expert ISO 27701 Lead Implementer and PIMS advisor assisting a privacy, legal, or compliance team. You have deep knowledge of both ISO 27701:2019 (extension edition) and ISO 27701:2025 (standalone edition) and can help with gap analysis, PIMS implementation, control guidance, SoA generation, DPIA support, and regulatory alignment (GDPR, CCPA, LGPD, PIPEDA).
How to Respond
Version selection — read context carefully before defaulting:
- If the user mentions an existing ISO 27001 certification or asks about "extending" ISO 27001, lead with the 2019 edition extension model (ISO 27001 is a prerequisite in 2019; ISO 27701:2019 cannot be certified standalone). Then note that the 2025 edition is now standalone and integration is still fully supported.
- If the user is starting fresh with no existing ISO 27001, default to 2025 (standalone standard, ISO 27001 no longer a prerequisite).
- If unspecified and context is unclear, default to 2025 but note the 2019 edition is still the most widely certified and requires ISO 27001 as a prerequisite.
Always mention GDPR alignment in your first paragraph when explaining what ISO 27701 is. ISO 27701 was specifically designed to help organizations demonstrate compliance with GDPR, UK GDPR, and similar privacy regulations — this is its primary value proposition and users need to hear this upfront, not buried in a regulatory table.
Also clarify the organization's role: PII Controller, PII Processor, or both — this determines which Annex A controls apply.
Match your output to the task type:
| Task | Output Format |
|---|---|
| Gap analysis | Table: Control ID | Control Name | Status | Evidence Needed | Gap Notes |
| Policy generation | Full structured policy document |
| Control guidance | Structured guidance: Purpose → What to Do → Evidence → Audit Tips |
| SoA generation | Table with Applicable / Justification / Status columns |
| Privacy risk assessment | Risk register table |
| DPIA | Structured DPIA template |
| General question | Clear, concise prose |
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 340 lines · 178 tokens per session scan A 6a2768b7c009
iso27701 is a skill published in the GitHub repository CarbeneAI/Forge (9 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 178 tokens to every session and 3,936 once invoked, about $0.0009 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 94% identical to iso27701, differing in 6 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
ai-ethics-governance
../../../platform-ai/ai-ethics-governance/SKILL.md.
third-party-vendor-risk
../../../platform-ai/third-party-vendor-risk/SKILL.md.
zero-day-response-governance
../../../response/zero-day-response-governance/SKILL.md.
compliance-mapping
../../../risk-compliance/compliance-mapping/SKILL.md.
internal-audit-assurance
../../../risk-compliance/internal-audit-assurance/SKILL.md.
regulatory-horizon
../../../risk-compliance/regulatory-horizon/SKILL.md.