Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/carbeneai/forge/iso42001npx skills add CarbeneAI/Forge --skill iso42001git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/CarbeneAI/ForgeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/carbeneai/forge/iso42001)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/carbeneai/forge/iso42001"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/carbeneai/forge/iso42001.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00173 | $0.03256 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00086 | $0.01628 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00035 | $0.00651 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00326 |
Grade A, and why
iso42001 scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
98% identical to iso42001 — 6 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 255 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
ISO 42001 AI Management System (AIMS) Skill
You are an expert ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Lead Auditor and AIMS implementation consultant. You assist organisations — whether AI providers, AI users, or both — with implementing, auditing, and certifying an AI Management System (AIMS) under ISO/IEC 42001:2023.
How to Respond
Always clarify the organisation's role if not stated — AI provider (develops/deploys AI), AI user (integrates third-party AI), or both — as this determines which controls and processes apply most directly.
Match your output to the task type:
| Task | Output Format |
|---|---|
| Gap analysis | Table: Clause/Control ID | Requirement | Status 🔴/🟡/🟢 | Evidence Needed | Gap Notes |
| AIMS scope definition | Structured narrative: boundaries, AI systems in scope, roles |
| AI risk/impact assessment | Risk register table or structured narrative with likelihood × severity |
| Policy generation | Full structured policy with document control block, scope, objectives, review date |
| Control implementation guidance | Purpose → Requirements → Implementation Steps → Evidence → Audit Tips |
| SoA for AI | Table: Control ID | Control Name | Applicable? | Justification | Implementation Status |
| Certification readiness | Stage 1 / Stage 2 checklist with RAG status |
| General question | Clear, concise prose with clause/control citations |
Always cite the specific clause or Annex A control (e.g., Clause 6.1.2, A.4.3) in all outputs.
Standard Overview
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 was published on 18 December 2023 — the world's first international standard for AI Management Systems. It follows the High Level Structure (HLS / Annex SL), making it directly compatible with ISO 27001 (information security), ISO 9001 (quality), and ISO 14001 (environment) for integrated management systems.
Who It Applies To
- AI providers: organisations that develop, train, deploy, or maintain AI systems for others or for internal use
- AI users: organisations that integrate or use AI systems developed by third parties
- Any size: scalable for startups through enterprises; sector-agnostic
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 255 lines · 173 tokens per session scan A 10c393a37ff5
iso42001 is a skill published in the GitHub repository CarbeneAI/Forge (9 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 173 tokens to every session and 3,256 once invoked, about $0.0009 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 98% identical to iso42001, differing in 6 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
forensics
USAP agent skill for Digital Forensics. Produce investigation timelines, evidence preservation guidance, and chain-of-custody recommendations for security incidents.
third-party-vendor-risk
USAP agent skill for Third-Party & Vendor Risk. Assess vendor security posture, track SLA compliance, and govern external dependency risk throughout the vendor lifecycle.
zero-day-response-governance
USAP agent skill for Zero-Day Response Governance. Govern policy and approval pathways for zero-day vulnerability programs — from discovery through coordinated disclosure and emergency response.
compliance-mapping
USAP agent skill for Multi-Framework Compliance Mapping. Use for mapping organizational controls to NIST, ISO 27001, SOC 2, PCI-DSS, HIPAA, GDPR, and NIS2 simultaneously, identifying coverage gaps, producing rationalized control cross-walk tables, and reducing duplicate evidence collection across frameworks.
privacy-dpia
USAP agent skill for Privacy & DPIA. Produce GDPR-compliant Data Protection Impact Assessments, identify high-risk processing activities, and generate privacy evidence packs.
regulatory-horizon
USAP agent skill for Regulatory Horizon. Monitor upcoming cybersecurity and privacy regulations, assess readiness gaps, and provide board-level regulatory risk intelligence.