n8n-validation-expert

n8n-validation-expert is a skill for Claude Code from CarbeneAI/Forge. It costs 55 tokens per session (3,645 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of n8n-validation-expert, MIT.

A guide to understanding n8n validation results, including errors that block a workflow and warnings that may cause problems. It explains common issues such as missing fields, invalid values, wrong data types, broken references, and invalid expressions.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to diagnose workflow and node validation results, understand severity levels, fix configuration problems, and review validation profiles.
Why use it?
It helps turn validation messages into concrete fixes instead of treating them as vague failures. It also supports the repeated check-and-fix cycle needed before activating a workflow.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/.

Good fit Use it to diagnose workflow and node validation results, understand severity levels, fix configuration problems, and review validation profiles.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/carbeneai/forge/n8n-validation-expert
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add CarbeneAI/Forge --skill n8n-validation-expert
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/CarbeneAI/Forge

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for n8n-validation-expert

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/carbeneai/forge/n8n-validation-expert/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/carbeneai/forge/n8n-validation-expert)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/carbeneai/forge/n8n-validation-expert"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/carbeneai/forge/n8n-validation-expert/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for n8n-validation-expert

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/carbeneai/forge/n8n-validation-expert"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/carbeneai/forge/n8n-validation-expert.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 55 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 3,645 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 100% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00055 $0.03645
Opus 5 $0.00028 $0.01822
Sonnet 5 $0.00011 $0.00729
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00364

Measured 6d ago against content hash 29bd4926b335, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-09, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

n8n-validation-expert scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

100% identical to n8n-validation-expert — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

.claude/skills/n8n-validation-expert/SKILL.md · 690 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 690 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

n8n Validation Expert

Expert guide for interpreting and fixing n8n validation errors.


Validation Philosophy

Validate early, validate often

Validation is typically iterative:

  • Expect validation feedback loops
  • Usually 2-3 validate → fix cycles
  • Average: 23s thinking about errors, 58s fixing them

Key insight: Validation is an iterative process, not one-shot!


Error Severity Levels

1. Errors (Must Fix)

Blocks workflow execution - Must be resolved before activation

Types:

  • missing_required - Required field not provided
  • invalid_value - Value doesn't match allowed options
  • type_mismatch - Wrong data type (string instead of number)
  • invalid_reference - Referenced node doesn't exist
  • invalid_expression - Expression syntax error

Example:

{
  "type": "missing_required",
  "property": "channel",
  "message": "Channel name is required",
  "fix": "Provide a channel name (lowercase, no spaces, 1-80 characters)"
}

2. Warnings (Should Fix)

Doesn't block execution - Workflow can be activated but may have issues

Types:

  • best_practice - Recommended but not required
  • deprecated - Using old API/feature
  • performance - Potential performance issue

Example:

{
  "type": "best_practice",
  "property": "errorHandling",
  "message": "Slack API can have rate limits",
  "suggestion": "Add onError: 'continueRegularOutput' with retryOnFail"
}

3. Suggestions (Optional)

Nice to have - Improvements that could enhance workflow

Types:

  • optimization - Could be more efficient
  • alternative - Better way to achieve same result

The Validation Loop

Pattern from Telemetry

7,841 occurrences of this pattern:

1. Configure node
   ↓
2. validate_node (23 seconds thinking about errors)
   ↓
3. Read error messages carefully
   ↓
4. Fix errors
   ↓
5. validate_node again (58 seconds fixing)
   ↓
6. Repeat until valid (usually 2-3 iterations)

Example

// Iteration 1
let config = {
  resource: "channel",
  operation: "create"
};

const result1 = validate_node({
  nodeType: "nodes-base.slack",
  config,
  profile: "runtime"
});
// → Error: Missing "name"

// ⏱️  23 seconds thinking...

// Iteration 2
config.name = "general";

const result2 = validate_node({
  nodeType: "nodes-base.slack",
  config,
  profile: "runtime"
});
// → Error: Missing "text"

// ⏱️  58 seconds fixing...

// Iteration 3
config.text = "Hello!";

const result3 = validate_node({
  nodeType: "nodes-base.slack",
  config,
  profile: "runtime"
});
// → Valid! ✅

Read the full file on GitHub · 690 lines

Files

What ships with it

3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 6d ago First seen · 690 lines · 55 tokens per session scan A 29bd4926b335

Subscribe to this mod's changes

n8n-validation-expert is a skill published in the GitHub repository CarbeneAI/Forge (9 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 55 tokens to every session and 3,645 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to n8n-validation-expert, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.